ArticleInternational journal of oncology2023
[Corrigendum] SB‑T‑121205, a next‑generation taxane, enhances apoptosis and inhibits migration/invasion in MCF‑7/PTX cells.
Article in International journal of oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Formosanin C inhibits triple-negative breast cancer progression by suppressing the phosphorylation of STAT3 and the polarization of M2 macrophages.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Comprehensive assessment of base excision repair (BER)-related lncRNAs as prognostic and functional biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma: implications for personalized therapeutics and immunomodulation.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subsequently to the publication of the above article, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that Fig. 4B on p. 899, showing the results of Transwell invasion assay experiments, contained a pair of apparently overlapping panels, such that they may have been derived from the same original source, even though they were intended to show the results from differently performed experiments. After having re‑examined their original data, the authors were able to identify that Fig. 4B had been inadvertently assembled incorrectly. The revised version of Fig. 4, featuring the correct data for the SB‑T‑121205, 10 nM data panel (the lower‑left panel in Fig. 4B), is shown on the next page. The authors confirm that these data continue to support the main conclusions presented in their paper, and are grateful to the Editor of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.