Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36484225›Full record

ArticleJournal of health services research & policy2023

Remote consultations in primary care across low-, middle- and high-income countries: Implications for policy and care delivery.

Siân Williams, Amanda Barnard, Phil Collis, Jaime Correia de Sousa, Suraj Ghimire, Monsur Habib, Tessa Jelen, Frank Kanniess, Vince Mak, Sonia Martins and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health services research & policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The next viral pandemic-where do we stand?Folia microbiologica · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Siân WilliamsInternational Primary Care Respiratory Group, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Amanda BarnardSchool of General Practice, Rural and Indigenous Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Phil CollisEuropean Lung Foundation, Leamington Spa, UK.
Jaime Correia de SousaLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6459-7908
Suraj GhimireInstitute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Monsur HabibBangladesh Primary Care Respiratory Society, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Tessa JelenBritish Lung Foundation Support Group, Westminster, London, UK.
Frank KanniessPractice for Family Medicine and Allergy, Reinfeld, Germany.
Vince MakImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Sonia MartinsABC Medical School Brazil, Brazil.
Ema PaulinoEzfy, Lisbon, Portugal.
Hilary PinnockUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Miguel RomanIdSBa, Palma, Spain.
Hanna SandelowskyDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Inst. NVS, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ioanna TsiligianniFaculty of Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, University of Crete, Greece.
Laurine van der SteenHilversum, Netherlands.
Fabio Weber DonatelliABC Medical School Brazil, Brazil.
British Lung Foundation · GBAustralian National University · AUImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBKarolinska Institutet · SETribhuvan University Teaching Hospital · NPUniversity of Crete · GRUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic mandated a substantial switch in primary health care delivery from an in-person to a mainly remote telephone or video service. As the COVID-19 pandemic approaches its third year, limited progress appears to have been made in terms of policy development around consultation methods for the post-acute phase of the pandemic. In September 2020, the International Primary Care Respiratory Group convened a global panel of primary care clinicians - including family physicians, paediatricians, pharmacists, academics and patients - to consider the policy and health management implications of the move to remote consultations in the primary care setting. The group gave special consideration to how and how far remote consultations should be integrated into routine primary health care delivery. Remote consultations can be a useful alternative to in-person consultations in primary care not only in situations where there is a need for viral infection control but also for the routine delivery of chronic disease management. However, they may not be more time efficient for the clinician, and they can add to the workload and work-related stress for primary care practitioners if they remain the dominant consultation mode. Remote consultations are also less appropriate than in-person consultations for new disease diagnosis, dealing with multiple issues and providing complex care. Ensuring health care professionals have the appropriate skill set to effectively deliver remote consultations, administrative and/or IT support and appropriate reimbursement will be key to achieving optimal integration of remote consultations into routine clinical practice. Addressing digital access and digital literacy issues at a societal level will also be essential to ensure individuals have fair and equitable access to the internet and sufficient security for exchange of personal and health-related data.

Indexed as

COVID-19Remote ConsultationDelivery of Health CareDeveloped CountriesHumansPandemicsPolicyPrimary Health Carehealth inequalitiesprimary health careremote consultations

Identifiers

PMID36484225
PMCPMC10363957
OpenAlexW4310942628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.