ArticleAndrology2023
Can a sperm selection technique improve embryo ploidy?
Article in Andrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on embryo euploidy rate in assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- New Insights from Toxinology in Mammalian Reproduction: A Systematic Review.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Microfluidic sperm selection versus density gradient centrifugation in ICSI cycles with abnormal semen parameters: a randomized sibling-oocyte study.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Sperm DNA fragmentation and its influence on mammalian reproduction.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Semen Quality and DNA Fragmentation After Limited Testicular Sperm Extraction in Non-Azoospermic Men With ART Failure: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- The role of sperm DNA fragmentation testing in predicting IVF and PGT-A outcomes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Microfluidics for in vitro fertilization: from science to clinical validation.Human reproduction update · 2026Review
- Factors associated withFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Review
- Comparison of Swim-Up and Microfluidic Sperm Sorting Methods in Selection of Sperm for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Teratozoospermia and Embryo Development: The Significance of Sperm Selection in In Vitro Fertilization Success.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Microfluidic Sorting Can Be Applied for Assisted Reproduction Sperm Selection in Different Cases of Semen Abnormalities.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- High sperm DNA fragmentation - finding a needle in the haystack: tips on selecting the best sperm for ICSI and ART.Asian journal of andrology · 2025Article
- Sperm Separation and Selection Techniques to Mitigate Sperm DNA Damage.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The intricate "ART" of ICSI.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Review
- Review
- Optimized sperm selection: a highly efficient device for the isolation of progressive motile sperm with low DNA fragmentation index.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpermatozoa with the highest motility retain a superior genomic integrity, and elevated sperm chromatin fragmentation (SCF) has been linked to a lower ability of the conceptus to develop and implant. Therefore, the utilization of a sperm selection method, such as microfluidic sperm selection (MFSS), is capable of reducing the SCF by yielding the most motile fraction of spermatozoa with the highest embryo developmental competence. What remains unclear, however, is the causal mechanism that links SCF to an impaired embryo development.
objectivesTo identify a relationship between SCF and an unexpectedly high proportion of embryo aneuploidy, while addressing treatment options. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe identified couples with a high incidence of embryo aneuploidy in a previous intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle with pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), utilizing spermatozoa selected by density gradient (DG). Terminal deoxynucleotidyl dUTP transferase nick-end labeling (TUNEL) and neutral Comet assays were carried out on the semen specimens to assess total SCF and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) fragmentation, respectively. These couples underwent subsequent ICSI/PGT-A cycles with MFSS. Total SCF and dsDNA fragmentation were compared between the two sperm selection methods. Embryo aneuploidy, implantation, clinical pregnancy, delivery, and pregnancy loss rates were compared between the couples' historical DG and subsequent MFSS cycles.
resultsIn 57 couples undergoing 71 ICSI/PGT-A cycles, where DG sperm selection was carried out, a high incidence of aneuploid embryos (74.7%) resulted in poor implantation and no viable pregnancies. Testing for SCF, inclusive of dsDNA breaks, evidenced a SCF of 26.2% and dsDNA break of 3.6% in the raw specimen, that decreased to 18.0% (p < 0.001) and 3.1%, respectively, in the DG processed specimen. Following MFSS, total SCF and dsDNA fragmentation decreased to 1.9% and 0.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). The embryo euploidy rate remarkable improved from 25.3% in the DG cycles to 42.9% in the MFSS cycles (p < 0.001). The 6.7% implantation rate in the DG cycles increased to 65.5% in the MFSS cycles (p < 0.001). Similarly, the clinical pregnancy rate rose from 10.5% (DG) to 64.6% (MFSS), resulting in a 62.5% delivery rate (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsIn couples with a relatively young female partner with a negative infertility workup, and a male partner with semen parameters adequate for ICSI, presenting with a high rate of embryo aneuploidy, an additional subtle male factor component may be the culprit. Thus, it is crucial to assess the SCF and test for the dsDNA breaks, which can eventually contribute to embryo chromosomal abnormalities. Given the inverse relationship between SCF and motility, a selection of the most motile gamete by MFSS enhanced the proportion of spermatozoa with an intact genome, contributing to the generation of more euploid embryos that are capable of implanting and yielding increased term pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.