ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022
Design of an efficient combined multipoint picking scheme for tea buds.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Powered End-to-End Agricultural Machinery: Intelligent Transformation of Design and Maintenance Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Optimized wavelength selection for eggplant seed vitality classification using information acquisition techniques.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Tea-YOLOv8s: A Tea Bud Detection Model Based on Deep Learning and Computer Vision.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Unstructured road extraction and roadside fruit recognition in grape orchards based on a synchronous detection algorithm.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- A tea bud segmentation, detection and picking point localization based on the MDY7-3PTB model.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Continuous identification of the tea shoot tip and accurate positioning of picking points for a harvesting from standard plantations.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Herein, a combined multipoint picking scheme was proposed, and the sizes of the end of the bud picker were selectively designed. Firstly, the end of the bud picker was abstracted as a fixed-size picking box, and it was assumed that the tea buds in the picking box have a certain probability of being picked. Then, the picking box coverage and the greedy algorithm were designed to make as few numbers of picking box set as possible to cover all buds to reduce the numbers of picking. Furthermore, the Graham algorithm and the minimum bounding box were applied to fine-tune the footholds of each picking box in the optimal coverage picking box set, so that the buds were concentrated in the middle of the picking boxes as much as possible. Moreover, the geometric center of each picking box was taken as a picking point, and the ant colony algorithm was used to optimize the picking path of the end of the bud picker. Finally, by analyzing the influence of several parameters on the picking performance of the end of the bud picker, the optimal sizes of the picking box were calculated successfully under different conditions. The experimental results showed that the average picking numbers of the combined multipoint picking scheme were reduced by 31.44%, the shortest picking path was decreased by 11.10%, and the average consumed time was reduced by 50.92% compared to the single-point picking scheme. We believe that the proposed scheme can provide key technical support for the subsequent design of intelligent bud-picking robots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.