Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36483946›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Effect of stem structural characteristics and cell wall components related to stem lodging resistance in a newly identified mutant of hexaploid wheat (

Darshana Bisht, Naveen Kumar, Yogita Singh, Rashmi Malik, Ivica Djalovic, Narendra Singh Dhaka, Neeraj Pal, Priyanka Balyan, Reyazul Rouf Mir, Vinay Kumar Singh and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Darshana BishtMolecular Cytogenetics Laboratory, Department of Molecular Biology & Genetic Engineering, College of Basic Science & Humanities, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India.
Naveen KumarMolecular Cytogenetics Laboratory, Department of Molecular Biology & Genetic Engineering, College of Basic Science & Humanities, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India.
Yogita SinghDepartment of Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, College of Biotechnology, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.
Rashmi MalikDepartment of Genetics & Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar, India.
Ivica DjalovicInstitute of Field and Vegetable Crops, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Narendra Singh DhakaDepartment of Genetics & Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar, India.
Neeraj PalMolecular Cytogenetics Laboratory, Department of Molecular Biology & Genetic Engineering, College of Basic Science & Humanities, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India.
Priyanka BalyanDepartment of Botany, Deva Nagri Post Graduate College, CCS University, Meerut, India.
Reyazul Rouf MirDivision of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir (SKUAST-Kashmir), Srinagar, India.
Vinay Kumar SinghDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India.
Om Parkash DhankherStockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States.
Upendra KumarDepartment of Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, College of Biotechnology, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.
Sundip KumarMolecular Cytogenetics Laboratory, Department of Molecular Biology & Genetic Engineering, College of Basic Science & Humanities, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India.
Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology · INChaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University · INChaudhary Charan Singh University · INInstitute of Field and Vegetable Crops · RSSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir · INUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In wheat, lodging is affected by anatomical and chemical characteristics of the stem cell wall. Plant characteristics determining the stem strength were measured in lodging tolerant mutant (PMW-2016-1) developed through mutation breeding utilizing hexaploid wheat cultivar, DPW-621-50. Various anatomical features, chemical composition, and mechanical strength of the culms of newly developed lodging-tolerant mutant (PMW-2016-1) and parent (DPW-621-50), were examined by light microscopy, the Klason method, prostate tester coupled with a Universal Tensile Machine, and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Significant changes in the anatomical features, including the outer radius of the stem, stem wall thickness, and the proportions of various tissues, and vascular bundles were noticed. Chemical analysis revealed that the lignin level in the PMW-2016-1 mutant was higher and exhibited superiority in stem strength compared to the DPW-621-50 parent line. The force (N) required to break the internodes of mutant PMW-2016-1 was higher than that of DPW-621-50. The results suggested that the outer stem radius, stem wall thickness, the proportion of sclerenchyma tissues, the number of large vascular bundles, and lignin content are important factors that affect the mechanical strength of wheat stems, which can be the key parameters for the selection of varieties having higher lodging tolerance. Preliminary studies on the newly identified mutant PMW-2016-1 suggested that this mutant may possess higher lodging tolerance because it has a higher stem strength than DPW-621-50 and can be used as a donor parent for the development of lodging-tolerant wheat varieties.

Indexed as

FTIRligninlodgingmutagenesisstem strengthUTMwheat

Identifiers

PMID36483946
PMCPMC9723335
OpenAlexW4309720504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.