ReviewCureus2022
The Safety of Minimally Invasive and Open Cholecystectomy in Elderly Patients With Acute Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Age Is Not So Important for Risk Stratification in Early Cholecystectomy for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the SPRiMACC Study Database.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus common bile duct exploration for extrahepatic bile duct stones and postoperative recurrence-associated risk factors.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elderly patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) often receive no surgical treatment due to a high number of comorbidities and a high risk of operations. With an increasingly aged population worldwide, this systematic review aims to review the safety of minimally invasive cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy in this population compared to younger patients. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar databases on July 2, 2022. Articles in the English language published in the last five years with free full text and involving elderly patients with AC treated with minimally invasive and open cholecystectomy were selected. Moreover, a quality assessment was carried out by using each study's most commonly used assessment tools. Initially, the search yielded 1,252 potentially relevant articles. After the final selection process, 11 studies were included: one cross-sectional study, eight cohort studies, one case-control study, and one systematic review with meta-analyses. These studies involved a total of 378,986 participants, with 375,623 elderly patients. In the elderly, cholecystitis severity, decreased physical status, and multiple comorbidities increase the risk of complications with cholecystectomy. In addition, the elderly had more complications, open surgery conversions, biliary tract injuries, leaks, postoperative mortality, and hospital length of stay than younger patients. Nevertheless, minimally invasive cholecystectomy is a viable treatment option for elderly patients when performing a thorough perioperative assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.