Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36483761›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2022

A space of goals: the cognitive geometry of informationally bounded agents.

Karen Archer, Nicola Catenacci Volpi, Franziska Bröker, Daniel Polani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Expert navigators deploy rational complexity-based decision precaching for large-scale real-world planning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen ArcherAdaptive Systems Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0953-5020
Nicola Catenacci VolpiAdaptive Systems Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0114-3041
Franziska BrökerGatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6707-984X
Daniel PolaniAdaptive Systems Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3233-5847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, Euclidean geometry is treated by scientists as

Indexed as

cognitive loadconstrained information processingdecision sequencesgeometryinformation-regularized Markov decision process

Identifiers

PMID36483761
PMCPMC9727502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.