Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36483748›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2022

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in the Management of Lichen Planus.

Vishalakshi Viswanath, Pradnya Joshi, Mayuri Dhakne, Dhiraj Dhoot, Namrata Mahadkar, Hanmant Barkate

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. PDE4 Inhibitor-Responsive Dermatoses: An Emerging Concept in Dermatology.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Exploring apremilast in the treatment of lichen planus pemphigoides: a new remedy.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Lichen Planus: What is New in Diagnosis and Treatment?American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vishalakshi ViswanathDepartment of Dermatology, Rajiv Gandhi Medical College, Thane, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5873-2242
Pradnya JoshiDepartment of Dermatology, Rajiv Gandhi Medical College, Thane, Maharashtra, India.
Mayuri DhakneDepartment of Dermatology, Rajiv Gandhi Medical College, Thane, Maharashtra, India.
Dhiraj DhootGlobal Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2045-9324
Namrata MahadkarGlobal Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Hanmant BarkateGlobal Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Gandhi Medical College & Hospital · INGlenmark Pharmaceuticals (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lichen planus is a chronic disease with often disappointing and less than optimal treatment options. Apremilast modulates inflammatory signalling pathways which play a central role in the pathogenesis of lichen planus, thus making it useful in the management of such patients. Materials and Methods: The present study was an investigator-initiated, single-centre, non-randomized, open-label, pilot study of the efficacy and safety of Apremilast in the treatment of lichen planus. All the patients were prescribed Apremilast 30mg, twice daily, for 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated for improvement in their lesions, based on the physician's global assessment (PGA), subject global assessment (SGA), and target area lesion symptom score (TALSS). Results: A total of 34 patients were included in the study; 26 patients completed the study duration and were considered for the final analysis. After 12 weeks, 34.61% (n = 9/26) patients showed 2 or more grade improvement in their disease as per PGA. About 42.30% (n = 11/26) patients achieved more than 50% improvement in their lesions based on the subject global assessment of their disease. There was a significant improvement in TALSS during the study period (p < 0.0001). Only 23.07% (n = 6/26) patients developed one or more adverse events because of Apremilast with headache being the commonest side effect. Conclusion: The results obtained in our study justify that Apremilast is efficacious and safe in the management of patients with lichen planus. Based on these results, Apremilast can be considered as a promising alternative treatment option in patients with lichen planus.

Indexed as

Apremilastefficacylichen planussafety

Identifiers

PMID36483748
PMCPMC9725926
OpenAlexW4311019887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.