Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36483443›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2022

Transmission visualizations of healthcare infection clusters: A scoping review.

Mya B Brady, Helena M VonVille, Joseph F White, Elise M Martin, Nathan J Raabe, Julie M Slaughter, Graham M Snyder

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Spatiotemporal trends in and challenges of addressing tuberculosis in Brazil before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, 2001-2023.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026
    Article
  2. TGV: suite of tools to visualize transmission graphs.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mya B BradyDepartment of Infection Prevention and Control, UPMC Presbyterian-Shadyside, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6419-9771
Helena M VonVilleUniversity of Pittsburgh Health Sciences Library System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5193-2391
Joseph F WhiteDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Elise M MartinDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5106-1864
Nathan J RaabeDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3258-9003
Julie M SlaughterDepartment of Infection Prevention and Control, UPMC Presbyterian-Shadyside, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Graham M SnyderDepartment of Infection Prevention and Control, UPMC Presbyterian-Shadyside, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5562-8880

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Training Program in Antimicrobial ResistanceT32AI138954 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HARRISON, LEE H · 2019 to 2023
$971k
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI138954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate infectious pathogen transmission data visualizations in outbreak publications. Design: Scoping review. Methods: Medline was searched for outbreak investigations of infectious diseases within healthcare facilities that included ≥1 data visualization of transmission using data observable by an infection preventionist showing temporal and/or spatial relationships. Abstracted data included the nature of the cluster(s) (pathogen, scope of transmission, and individuals involved) and data visualization characteristics including visualization type, transmission elements, and software. Results: From 1,957 articles retrieved, we analyzed 30 articles including 37 data visualizations. The median cluster size was 20.5 individuals (range, 7-1,963) and lasted a median of 214 days (range, 12-5,204). Among the data visualization types, 10 (27%) were floor-plan transmission maps, 6 (16%) were timelines, 11 (30%) were transmission networks, 3 (8%) were Gantt charts, 4 (11%) were cluster map, and 4 (11%) were other types. In addition, 26 data visualizations (70%) contained spatial elements, 26 (70%) included person type, and 19 (51%) contained time elements. None of the data visualizations contained contagious periods and only 2 (5%) contained symptom-onset date. Conclusions: The data visualizations of healthcare-associated infectious disease outbreaks in the systematic review were diverse in type and visualization elements, though no data visualization contained all elements important to deriving hypotheses about transmission pathways. These findings aid in understanding the visualizing transmission pathways by describing essential elements of the data visualization and will inform the creation of a standardized mapping tool to aid in earlier initiation of interventions to prevent transmission.

Identifiers

PMID36483443
PMCPMC9726548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.