Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36483385›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2022

Opportunities for penicillin allergy evaluation in dental clinics.

Amanda Vivo, Michael J Durkin, Ibuola Kale, Taylor Boyer, Margaret A Fitzpatrick, Charlesnika T Evans, M Marianne Jurasic, Gretchen Gibson, Katie J Suda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda VivoCenter of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. Veterans' Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Hines, Illinois.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8950-527X
Michael J DurkinWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Ibuola KaleCenter of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. Veterans' Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Hines, Illinois.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0672-3328
Taylor BoyerCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8280-850X
Margaret A FitzpatrickCenter of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. Veterans' Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Hines, Illinois.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1919-9238
Charlesnika T EvansCenter of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. Veterans' Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Hines, Illinois.
M Marianne JurasicVeterans' Health Administration Office of Dentistry, Washington, DC.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8179-1443
Gretchen GibsonVeterans' Health Administration Office of Dentistry, Washington, DC.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9345-8552
Katie J SudaCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital · USBoston University · USLoyola University Chicago · USNorthwestern University · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

HSRD VA I01 HX002452HSRD VA IK6 HX003156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate opportunities for assessing penicillin allergies among patients presenting to dental clinics. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Setting: VA dental clinics. Patients: Adult patients with a documented penicillin allergy who received an antibiotic from a dentist between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, were included. Methods: Chart reviews were completed on random samples of 100 patients who received a noncephalosporin antibiotic and 200 patients who received a cephalosporin. Each allergy was categorized by severity. These categories were used to determine patient eligibility for 3 testing groups based on peer-reviewed algorithms: (1) no testing, (2) skin testing, and (3) oral test-dose challenge. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were used to compare facility and patient demographics first between true penicillin allergy, pseudo penicillin allergy, and missing allergy documentation, and between those who received a cephalosporin and those who did not at the dental visit. Results: Overall, 19% lacked documentation of the nature of allergic reaction, 53% were eligible for skin testing, 27% were eligible for an oral test-dose challenge, and 1% were contraindicated from testing. Male patients and African American patients were less likely to receive a cephalosporin. Conclusions: Most penicillin-allergic patients in the VA receiving an antibiotic from a dentist are eligible for penicillin skin testing or an oral penicillin challenge. Further research is needed to understand the role of dentists and dental clinics in assessing penicillin allergies.

Identifiers

PMID36483385
PMCPMC9726497
OpenAlexW4226108173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.