Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36483372›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2022

Impact of provider-selected indication requirement on urine test utilization and positivity.

Jessica A Penney, Angie Mae Rodday, Paola Sebastiani, David R Snydman, Shira I Doron

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. When urine testing to rule out infection does more harm than good.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica A PenneyDivision of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Disease, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5363-4742
Angie Mae RoddayInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Paola SebastianiInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6419-1545
David R SnydmanDivision of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Disease, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shira I DoronDivision of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Disease, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9139-0857
Tufts Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of the addition of an indication specification requirement to isolated urine-culture ordering on testing utilization. Design: Retrospective study utilizing interrupted time series analysis with negative binomial regression. The preintervention period was October 1, 2018-November 11, 2019, and the postintervention period was November 12, 2019-October 31, 2020. The primary outcome was isolated culture rate per 1,000 patient days. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of all urine tests ordered as isolated urine culture and culture positivity. An exploratory analysis assessed the appropriateness of selected testing indications. Setting: A 415-bed, urban, academic medical center. Patients: Adult patients with urine testing performed during hospital admission. In total, 1,494 unique isolated urine-culture orders were included in the analysis. Interventions: On November 12, 2019, the laboratory order interface was changed to require the ordering provider to select an indication for isolated urine culture. Results: Isolated urine-culture rates did not significantly change after the intervention (11.2-7.8 cultures per 1,000 patient days; Conclusions: The addition of an order-specification requirement for isolated urine-culture testing did not significantly affect ordering practices. The test remains overused as the initial diagnostic evaluation for a suspected urinary tract infection. Further provider education and continued changes in provider workflow are needed to achieve lasting change in practice.

Identifiers

PMID36483372
PMCPMC9726588
OpenAlexW4285217968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.