Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36483362›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2022

A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research.

Maarten Heuvelmans, Willem Woudstra, Herman F Wunderink, Jan F Monkelbaan, Henny C van der Mei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maarten HeuvelmansDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2381-7086
Willem WoudstraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7212-3443
Herman F WunderinkDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9491-0790
Jan F MonkelbaanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9030-059X
Henny C van der MeiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Duodenoscopy-associated infections and outbreaks are reported globally despite strict adherence to duodenoscope reprocessing protocols. Therefore, new developments in the reprocessing procedure are needed. Design: We evaluated a novel dynamic flow model for an additional cleaning step between precleaning and manual cleaning in the reprocessing procedure. Methods: A parallel plate flow chamber with a fluorinated ethylene propylene bottom plate was used to mimic the duodenoscope channels. The flow chamber was inoculated with a suspension containing Results: During precleaning both PBS and 1% (v/v) Neodisher Mediclean Forte were able to desorb bacteria, but neither proved superior. After precleaning only sodium dodecyl sulfate could desorb bacteria. Conclusions: Flushing during precleaning is an essential step for reducing adhering luminal bacteria, and sodium dodecyl sulfate is a promising detergent for bacterial desorption from duodenoscope channels after precleaning.

Identifiers

PMID36483362
PMCPMC9726593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.