Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36483283›Full record

ReviewAsiaIntervention2022

Clinical expert consensus document on the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices during complex high-risk PCI in India using a standardised algorithm.

Rajiv Tayal, Sanjog Kalra, Ashok Seth, Praveen Chandra, Sumit Sohal, Kirti Punamiya, Ravinder Rao, Vishal Rastogi, P L N Kapardhi, Sanjeev Sharma and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AsiaIntervention, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patient selection for complex, high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: an overview.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Mechanical circulatory support for complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Rajiv TayalInterventional Cardiology Unit, The Valley Hospital, Ridgewood, NJ, USA.
Sanjog KalraInterventional Cardiology Unit, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Ashok SethInterventional Cardiology Unit, Fortis Escorts Heart Institute, New Delhi, India.
Praveen ChandraInterventional Cardiology Unit, Medanta Heart Institute, Gurgaon, India.
Sumit SohalInterventional Cardiology Unit, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, NJ, USA.
Kirti PunamiyaInterventional Cardiology Unit, Breach Candy Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Ravinder RaoInterventional Cardiology Unit, Rajasthan Hospital, Jaipur, India.
Vishal RastogiInterventional Cardiology Unit, Fortis Escorts Heart Institute, New Delhi, India.
P L N KapardhiInterventional Cardiology Unit, CARE Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
Sanjeev SharmaInterventional Cardiology Unit, Eternal Hospital, Jaipur, India.
Prathap KumarInterventional Cardiology Unit, Meditrina Group of Hospitals, Kollam, India.
Jaspal ArnejaInterventional Cardiology Unit, Arneja Heart and Multispeciality Hospital, Nagpur, India.
Rony MathewInterventional Cardiology Unit, Lisie Hospital, Ernakulam, India.
Dilip KumarInterventional Cardiology Unit, Medica Superspecialty Hospital, Kolkata, India.
N K MaheshInterventional Cardiology Unit, Apollo Adlux Hospital, Kochi, India.
Vijay TrehanInterventional Cardiology Unit, Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pLVAD), such as the Impella microaxial flow pump (Abiomed), have been increasingly used to provide haemodynamic support during complex and high-risk revascularisation procedures to reduce the risk of intraprocedural haemodynamic compromise and to facilitate complete and optimal revascularisation. A global consensus on patient selection for the use of pLVADs, however, is currently lacking. Access to these devices is different across the world, thus, individual health care environments need to create and refine patient selection paradigms to optimise the use of these devices. The Impella pLVAD has recently been introduced in India and is being used in several centres in the management of high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and cardiogenic shock. With this increasing utilisation, there is a need for a standardised evaluation protocol to guide Impella use that factors in the unique economic and infrastructural characteristics of India's health care system to ensure that the needs of patients are optimally managed. In this consensus document, we present an algorithm to guide Impella use in Indian patients: to establish a standardised patient selection and usage paradigm that will allow both optimal patient outcomes and ongoing data collection.

Identifiers

PMID36483283
PMCPMC9706744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.