Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36483276›Full record

ReviewAsiaIntervention2022

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients aged 80 years old and above: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Norman H Lin, Jamie S-Y Ho, Andie Hartanto Djohan, Vanda Wen-Teng Ho, Yao Neng Teo, Yao Hao Teo, Nicholas L Syn, Yin Nwe Aye, Rodney Y H Soh, Tiong-Cheng Yeo and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AsiaIntervention, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Norman H LinDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore.
Jamie S-Y HoAcademic Foundation Programme, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Andie Hartanto DjohanDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore.
Vanda Wen-Teng HoDivision of Geriatric Medicine, University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore.
Yao Neng TeoDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Yao Hao TeoDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Nicholas L SynDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Yin Nwe AyeDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore.
Rodney Y H SohDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore.
Tiong-Cheng YeoDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore.
Hui-Wen SimDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore.
Huay-Cheem TanDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore.
Mark Y ChanDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore.
Ching-Hui SiaDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ischaemic heart disease remains the main cause of death in the world. With increasing age, frailty and comorbidities, senior patients aged 80 years old and above who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at higher risk of mortality and other complications. Aims: We aimed to examine the overall outcomes for this group of patients. Methods: Four databases (PUBMED, EMBASE, SCOPUS and CENTRAL) were searched. Studies with patients aged 80 years old and above who underwent PCI for all indications were included. Pooled outcomes of all-cause death, cardiac death, in-hospital death, subsequent stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA), subsequent myocardial infarction (MI), subsequent congestive cardiac failure (CCF), and overall major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were obtained for meta-analysis. Results: From 2,566,004 patients, the pooled cumulative incidence of death was 19.22%, cardiac death was 7.78%, in-hospital death was 7.16%, subsequent stroke/TIA was 1.54%, subsequent MI was 3.58%, subsequent CCF was 4.74%, and MACE was 17.51%. The mortality rate of all patients was high when followed up for 3 years (33.27%). ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients had more outcomes of in-hospital death (14.24% vs 4.89%), stroke/TIA (1.93% vs 0.12%), MI (3.68 vs 1.55%) and 1-year mortality (26.16% vs 13.62%), when compared to non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Conclusions: There was a high mortality rate at 1 year and 3 years post-PCI in the overall population of senior patients aged 80 years old and above, regardless of indication. This necessitates further studies to explore the implications of these observations.

Identifiers

PMID36483276
PMCPMC9706774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.