Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36483187›Full record

Trial reportClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Finger-Prick Autologous Blood (FAB) Eye Drops for Dry Eye Disease: Single Masked Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial.

Ali Hassan, Shafi Balal, Erica Cook, Hakim-Moulay Dehbi, Shahina Pardhan, Rupert Bourne, Sajjad Ahmad, Anant Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Blood Derivatives in the Therapy of Ocular Surface Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Autologous blood in the management of ocular surface disorders.World journal of experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ali Hassan *Department of External Eye Diseases, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Shafi Balal *Department of External Eye Diseases, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7683-2741
Erica CookDepartment of Healthcare, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK.
Hakim-Moulay DehbiTrials department, Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK.
Shahina PardhanDepartment of Eye Research, Vision and Eye Research Institute (VERI) Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Rupert BourneDepartment of Ophthalmology, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Sajjad AhmadDepartment of External Eye Diseases, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8336-4314
Anant SharmaDepartment of External Eye Diseases, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Moorfields Eye Hospital · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBAnglia Ruskin University · GBMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBUniversity of Bedfordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the quantitative and qualitative efficacy of finger-prick autologous blood (FAB) eye drops versus conventional medical therapy for the treatment of severe dry eye disease (DED). Methods: Two centre, single masked, randomised controlled trial. Sixty patients in total were recruited with thirty patients (sixty eyes) treated with FAB eye drops four times per day in addition to their conventional DED treatment, and thirty patients (fifty-eight eyes) served as control subjects on conventional treatment alone. Ocular surface disease index (OSDI), Schirmer's test, fluorescein ocular staining grade (OCSG) Oxford schema and fluorescein tear film break-up time (TBUT), were performed at baseline, at 4 and 8 weeks. Results: OSDI scores significantly decreased in the FAB arm by greater than -17.68 (-37.67 to -2.96, p=0.02) compared to the control arm. There were greater improvements in OCSG and TBUT in the FAB arm but these were non-significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: This feasibility study demonstrates adding FAB eye drops to conventional medical therapy for DED improves mean OSDI symptom score compared to conventional medical therapy alone. It may have particular use in settings where serum is unobtainable. An adequately powered and well-designed randomised trial is needed to further evaluate the long-term clinical benefit of FAB.

Indexed as

autologousdry eyefinger-prickserum

Identifiers

PMID36483187
PMCPMC9724572
OpenAlexW4311023042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.