Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36483156›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of gastroenterology2022

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopic findings in celiac disease at diagnosis: A multicenter international retrospective study.

Juan Pablo Stefanolo, Fabiana Zingone, Carolina Gizzi, Ilaria Marsilio, María Luján Espinet, Edgardo Gustavo Smecuol, Mark Khaouli, María Laura Moreno, María I Pinto-Sánchez, Sonia Isabel Niveloni and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Non-biopsy Strategy for the Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Adults: A Narrative Review.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Juan Pablo StefanoloSmall Bowel Section, Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital, Buenos Aires 1264, Argentina.
Fabiana ZingoneDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padova 35124, Italy.
Carolina GizziDepartment of Medicine, Surgery, Dentistry, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Salerno 84081, Italy.
Ilaria MarsilioDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padova 35124, Italy.
María Luján EspinetSmall Bowel Section, Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital, Buenos Aires 1264, Argentina.
Edgardo Gustavo SmecuolSmall Bowel Section, Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital, Buenos Aires 1264, Argentina.
Mark KhaouliDepartment of Medicine, Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton L8S 4K1, Canada.
María Laura MorenoSmall Bowel Section, Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital, Buenos Aires 1264, Argentina.
María I Pinto-SánchezDepartment of Medicine, Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton L8S 4K1, Canada.
Sonia Isabel NiveloniSmall Bowel Section, Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital, Buenos Aires 1264, Argentina.
Elena F VerdúDepartment of Medicine, Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton L8S 4K1, Canada.
Carolina CiacciDepartment of Medicine, Surgery, Dentistry, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Salerno 84081, Italy.
Julio César BaiSmall Bowel Section, Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital, Buenos Aires 1264, Argentina.
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires · ARDigestive Health Research Institute · FRUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Salerno · ITUniversidad del Salvador · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastroduodenal endoscopy and biopsy following positive specific serology is considered the gold standard to diagnose celiac disease (CeD) in adults. Whether upper endoscopy helps detect comorbid conditions is unknown.

aimTo investigate the prevalence of non-celiac endoscopic findings in patients in whom endoscopy was performed to confirm CeD diagnosis.

methodsThis is an observational, descriptive, multicenter, retrospective study that reports endoscopic findings obtained in adult patients enrolled in local registries from four tertiary centers. We collected data reported on first endoscopy, indicated for investigation of CeD. Diagnosis of CeD was performed by histology (≥ Marsh 2 type mucosal damage) and specific serology. Two European and one North American center included biopsy-confirmed CeD following positive serology. A fourth center (South America) included symptomatic patients undergoing endoscopy, irrespective of CeD serology. The latter cohort included a non-CeD control group.

resultsA total of 1328 patients (80% female; 35 years median age) were enrolled, of whom 95.6% had positive specific serology. In 135 patients, endoscopy revealed 163 abnormalities unrelated to CeD (prevalence: 10.1%). Erosive reflux esophagitis (6.4%), gastric erosions (2.0%), and suspicion of esophageal metaplasia (1.2%) were the most common findings. Biopsy-confirmed Barrett's esophagus was infrequent (0.2%). No endoscopic cancer was detected. Older patients (≥ 51 years of age) had a higher prevalence of endoscopic findings than those ≤ 50 (

conclusionIn this large multicenter study, young adults with positive CeD serology had few comorbid endoscopic findings. Although patients over 51 years had a high prevalence of non-CeD gastroduodenal mucosal damage, no malignancy or premalignant lesions were found.

Indexed as

Celiac DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSouth AmericaCeliac diseaseConcomitant endoscopic lesionsMalignanciesMulticenter studyUpper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID36483156
PMCPMC9724482
OpenAlexW4309307525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.