ArticleBMJ neurology open2022
Long-term evaluation parameters in GNE myopathy: a 5-year observational follow-up natural history study.
Article in BMJ neurology open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ultra-Orphan drug development for GNE Myopathy: A synthetic literature review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy confirmation study of aceneuramic acid administration for GNE myopathy in Japan.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Trial
- Molecular genetics and therapeutic development for GNE myopathy.Journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Decoding GNE Myopathy: From Molecular Basis to Therapeutic Advances.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2025Article
- Disease Progression of GNE Myopathy and Its Relationship With Genotype: A Retrospective, Observational Study in Chinese Patients.Neurology. Genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A number of clinical trials targeting GNE myopathy patients have been conducted. However, useful clinical parameters for postmarketing surveillance and long-term clinical observation have not yet been established. Objective: We conducted a 5-year observational follow-up natural history study to identify evaluation parameters, which may be useful for the long-term observation of GNE myopathy patients. Methods: Thirty-three genetically confirmed GNE myopathy patients were recruited and evaluated at study entry (baseline) and yearly in a 5-year follow-up. Hand-held dynamometer measurements of knee extension strength, grip power and pinch power, summed Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) score of 17 muscles, Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM), 6 min walk test, percent vital capacity and percent forced vital capacity (%FVC), lean body mass (whole body, arms and legs), creatine kinase, Barthel Index, modified Rankin Scale and 36-item Short Form Survey national standard scores were examined. Results: Of the 33 patients, 22 (66%) completed evaluations for the entire 5-year follow-up period. These patients had a significant reduction in summed MMT score (p=0.005), GMFM (p=0.005), pinch power (p<0.001) and %FVC (p<0.001) at the fifth year evaluation relative to baseline. Among these parameters, summed MMT score, GMFM, pinch power and %FVC showed significant changes even in non-ambulant patients. Conclusions: MMT, GMFM, pinch power and %FVC are useful parameters for the long-term evaluation of GNE myopathy patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.