Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36483063›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Low-Dose Hemibody Radiation, a Treatment Option for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Phase 2 Single-Arm Trial.

Ian S Dayes, Allison E Kennedy, Sameer Parpia, Christopher Thome, Sujeenthar Tharmalingam, Jennifer A Lemon, Dawn M E Bowdish, Douglas R Boreham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ian S DayesDepartment of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Allison E KennedyMcMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sameer ParpiaDepartment of Oncology, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Christopher ThomeMedical Sciences Division, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Sujeenthar TharmalingamMedical Sciences Division, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer A LemonMedical Sciences Division, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
Dawn M E BowdishMcMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Douglas R BorehamMedical Sciences Division, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
NOSM University · CAMcMaster University Medical Centre · CAJuravinski Cancer Centre · CAMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Nontargeted low-dose ionizing radiation has been proposed as a cancer therapeutic for several decades; however, questions remain about the duration of hematological changes and optimal dosing regimen. Early studies delivering fractionated low doses of radiation to patients with cancer used varying doses and schedules, which make it difficult to standardize a successful dose and scheduling system for widespread use. The aim of this phase 2 two-stage trial was to determine whether low-dose radiation therapy (LD-RT) reduced prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in patients with recurrent prostate cancer in efforts to delay initiation of conventional therapies that are known to decrease quality of life. The primary study outcome was reduction in PSA levels by at least 50%. Methods and Materials: Sixteen patients with recurrent prostate cancer were recruited and received 2 doses of 150 mGy of nontargeted radiation per week, for 5 consecutive weeks, with 15 participants completing the study. Results: A maximal response of 40.5% decrease in PSA at 3 months was observed. A total of 8 participants remained off any additional interventions, of whom 3 had minor fluctuations in PSA for at least 1 year after treatment. The most common adverse event reported was mild fatigue during active treatment (n = 4), which did not persist in the follow-up period. No participants withdrew due to safety concerns or hematological abnormalities (ie, platelet ≤50 × 10 Conclusions: Our study did not meet the primary objective; however, LD-RT may be a potential therapy for some patients with recurrent prostate cancer by stalling rising PSA. This study also demonstrates that low-dose radiation is well tolerated by participants with minimal toxicities and no change in quality of life.

Identifiers

PMID36483063
PMCPMC9723318
OpenAlexW4297939909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.