Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36483058›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Effect of Favorable Pathologic Response After Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy Alone in Soft-tissue Sarcoma.

Russell F Palm, Casey L Liveringhouse, Ricardo J Gonzalez, Marilyn M Bui, Odion Binitie, George Q Yang, Arash O Naghavi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy and pathologic response for soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of limbs and trunk: experience from a tertiary cancer center.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Russell F PalmDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa Florida.
Casey L LiveringhouseDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa Florida.
Ricardo J GonzalezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa Florida.
Marilyn M BuiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa Florida.
Odion BinitieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa Florida.
George Q YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa Florida.
Arash O NaghaviDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa Florida.
Moffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Whether the therapeutic response of soft-tissue sarcoma to neoadjuvant treatment is predictive for clinical outcomes is unclear. Given the rarity of this disease and the confounding effects of chemotherapy, this study analyzes whether a favorable pathologic response (fPR) after neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT) alone is associated with clinical benefits. Methods and Materials: An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was conducted on a database of patients with primary soft-tissue sarcoma treated at our institution between 1987 and 2015 with neoadjuvant RT alone followed by surgical resection. Time-to-event outcomes estimated with a Kaplan-Meier analysis included overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control, and distant control (DC). Cox regression analyses were performed to determine prognostic variables associated with clinical outcomes. Results: Of the overall cohort of 315 patients, 181 patients (57%) were included in the primary analysis with documented pathologic necrosis (PN) rates (mean: 59%) and a median follow up from diagnosis of 48 months (range, 4-170 months). The median neoadjuvant RT dose was 50 Gy (range, 40-60 Gy), and the majority of patients had negative surgical margins (79%). Only 35 patients (19%) achieved a fPR (PN ≥95%), which was associated with a higher R0 resection rate (94% vs. 75%; Conclusions: Achieving fPR with neoadjuvant RT alone is associated with a higher R0 resection rate and possible DC benefit, translating into a significant improvement in PFS. Further studies to improve pathologic response rates and prospectively validate this endpoint are warranted.

Identifiers

PMID36483058
PMCPMC9723307
OpenAlexW4297537382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.