Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36483051›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Progression of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation: Current status of research.

Shilun Wu, Zhuxin Li, Changyu Yao, Shuying Dong, Jun Gao, Shan Ke, Ruhang Zhu, Sen Huang, Shaohong Wang, Li Xu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. New insights into mechanisms and interventions of locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shilun WuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhuxin LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Changyu YaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shuying DongDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jun GaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shan KeDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ruhang ZhuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Sen HuangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shaohong WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Li XuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chen YeDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jian KongDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wenbing SunDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains an important disease for health care systems in view of its high morbidity, mortality, and increasing incidence worldwide. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is preferred to surgery as a local treatment for HCC because it is safer, less traumatic, less painful, better tolerated, causes fewer adverse reactions, and allows more rapid postoperative recovery. The biggest shortcoming of RFA when used to treat HCC is the high incidence of residual tumor, which is often attributed to the vascular thermal deposition effect, the wide infiltration zone of peripheral venules, and the distance between satellite foci and the main focus of the cancer. Recurrence and progression of the residual tumor is the most important determinant of the prognosis. Therefore, it is important to be aware of the risk of recurrence and to improve the efficacy of RFA. This review summarizes the relevant literature and the possible mechanisms involved in progression of HCC after RFA. Current studies have demonstrated that multimodal treatments which RFA combined with other anti-cancer approaches can prevent progression of HCC after RFA.

Indexed as

hepatocellular carcinomapreventionradiofrequency ablationresidual tumortumor progression

Identifiers

PMID36483051
PMCPMC9723167
OpenAlexW4309731549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.