Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36483044›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Deep learning for the detection of anatomical tissue structures and neoplasms of the skin on scanned histopathological tissue sections.

Katharina Kriegsmann, Frithjof Lobers, Christiane Zgorzelski, Jörg Kriegsmann, Charlotte Janßen, Rolf Rüdinger Meliß, Thomas Muley, Ulrich Sack, Georg Steinbuss, Mark Kriegsmann

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multi-Modal Foundation Models for Computational Pathology: A Survey.Transactions on machine learning research · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Quilt-1M: One Million Image-Text Pairs for Histopathology.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Katharina KriegsmannDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Frithjof LobersDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Christiane ZgorzelskiInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jörg KriegsmannMVZ Histology, Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics Trier, Trier, Germany.
Charlotte JanßenCenter for Industrial Mathematics (ZeTeM), University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Rolf Rüdinger MelißInstitute for Dermatopathology, Hannover, Germany.
Thomas MuleyTranslational Lung Research Centre (TLRC) Heidelberg, Member of the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Ulrich SackDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Georg SteinbussDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mark KriegsmannInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DELeipzig University · DEGerman Center for Lung Research · DETrier University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversity of Bremen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) and melanoma are among the most common cancer types. Correct diagnosis based on histological evaluation after biopsy or excision is paramount for adequate therapy stratification. Deep learning on histological slides has been suggested to complement and improve routine diagnostics, but publicly available curated and annotated data and usable models trained to distinguish common skin tumors are rare and often lack heterogeneous non-tumor categories. A total of 16 classes from 386 cases were manually annotated on scanned histological slides, 129,364 100 x 100 µm (~395 x 395 px) image tiles were extracted and split into a training, validation and test set. An EfficientV2 neuronal network was trained and optimized to classify image categories. Cross entropy loss, balanced accuracy and Matthews correlation coefficient were used for model evaluation. Image and patient data were assessed with confusion matrices. Application of the model to an external set of whole slides facilitated localization of melanoma and non-tumor tissue. Automated differentiation of BCC, SqCC, melanoma, naevi and non-tumor tissue structures was possible, and a high diagnostic accuracy was achieved in the validation (98%) and test (97%) set. In summary, we provide a curated dataset including the most common neoplasms of the skin and various anatomical compartments to enable researchers to train, validate and improve deep learning models. Automated classification of skin tumors by deep learning techniques is possible with high accuracy, facilitates tumor localization and has the potential to support and improve routine diagnostics.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdeep learning - artificial neural networkdermatopathologydigital pathologypathology

Identifiers

PMID36483044
PMCPMC9723465
OpenAlexW4311027007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.