Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36482957›Full record

ReviewLe infezioni in medicina2022

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants: current situation and future trends.

Ramadan Abdelmoez Farahat, Abdelaziz Abdelaal, Tungki Pratama Umar, Amro A El-Sakka, Amira Yasmine Benmelouka, Khaled Albakri, Iftikhar Ali, Tareq Al-Ahdal, Basel Abdelazeem, Ranjit Sah and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Le infezioni in medicina, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Influenza A, influenza B, and SARS-COV-2 circulation patterns in midwest Brazil during the 2022-2023 period.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 11 countries.

Ramadan Abdelmoez FarahatFaculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt.
Abdelaziz AbdelaalHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Tungki Pratama UmarFaculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia.
Amro A El-SakkaFaculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Amira Yasmine BenmeloukaFaculty of Medicine, University of Algiers, Algiers, Algeria.
Khaled AlbakriFaculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Iftikhar AliDepartment of Pharmacy, Paraplegic Center, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Tareq Al-AhdalInstitute of Global Health (HIGH), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Basel AbdelazeemDepartment of Internal Medicine, McLaren Health Care, Flint, Michigan, USA.
Ranjit SahDepartment of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Alfonso J Rodriguez-MoralesGrupo de Investigación Biomedicina, Faculty of Medicine, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de Las Américas, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia.
Boston University · USDr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre · INHashemite University · JOHeidelberg University · DEKafrelsheikh University · EGLebanese American University · LBMichigan State University · USSriwijaya University · IDSuez Canal University · EGUniversity of Algiers 3 · DZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) has been the most recent variant of concern (VOC) established by the World Health Organization (WHO). Because of its greater infectivity and immune evasion, this variant quickly became the dominant type of circulating SARS-CoV-2 worldwide. Our literature review thoroughly explains the current state of Omicron emergence, particularly by comparing different omicron subvariants, including BA.2, BA.1, and BA.3. Such elaboration would be based on structural variations, mutations, clinical manifestation, transmissibility, pathogenicity, and vaccination effectiveness. The most notable difference between the three subvariants is the insufficiency of deletion (Δ69-70) in the spike protein, which results in a lower detection rate of the spike (S) gene target known as (S) gene target failure (SGTF). Furthermore, BA.2 had a stronger affinity to the human Angiotensin-converting Enzyme (hACE2) receptor than other Omicron sub-lineages. Regarding the number of mutations, BA.1.1 has the most (40), followed by BA.1, BA.3, and BA.3 with 39, 34, and 31 mutations, respectively. In addition, BA.2 and BA.3 have greater transmissibility than other sub-lineages (BA.1 and BA.1.1). These characteristics are primarily responsible for Omicron's vast geographical spread and high contagiousness rates, particularly BA.2 sub-lineages.

Indexed as

BA.2 sub-lineagesCOVID-19immune evasionOmicron variantSARS-CoV-2spike proteintransmissibility

Identifiers

PMID36482957
PMCPMC9714996
OpenAlexW4310758347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.