ReviewLe infezioni in medicina2022
Why do we miss isolated male genital tuberculosis diagnosis?
Review in Le infezioni in medicina, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis remains a worldwide health problem. It can affect the entire genitourinary tract. Tuberculosis of male genital tract still presents a diagnostic dilemma because of its varied presentations and the unavailability of sensitive and specific investigations. "Urogenital tuberculosis" is the most common term used in the literature. Male genital tuberculosis (MGTB) is usually reviewed together with urinary tract tuberculosis because often both sites are involved simultaneously; however, this is not always the case and current terminology may need to be modified. Until now, little importance has been given to isolated MGTB diagnosis. The current methods used for diagnosis are not adequate and the optimal strategy warrants further studies with a special attention on the evaluation of sperm investigations. In this review, we aim to establish a summary on the type of tuberculosis affecting only the male genital tract. We recommend that the diagnosis of MGTB should be made taking into consideration the epidemiological data, the clinical presentation, and performance of latest molecular or immunological tools from urine, sperm, blood, other fluids or tissue specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.