Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36482923›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasonography2022

Lung Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography Comparison in Convalescent Athletes after Sars-CoV-2 Infection - A Preliminary Study.

Maria Binkiewicz-Orluk, Marcin Konopka, Agnieszka Jakubiak, Wojciech Król, Wojciech Braksator, Marek Kuch

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasonography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Binkiewicz-OrlukDepartment of Cardiology, Hypertension and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7159-4825
Marcin KonopkaDepartment of Sports Cardiology and Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1050-438X
Agnieszka JakubiakDepartment of Heart Failure and Cardiac Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5087-1734
Wojciech KrólDepartment of Sports Cardiology and Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7414-5227
Wojciech BraksatorDepartment of Sports Cardiology and Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2201-4887
Marek KuchDepartment of Cardiology, Hypertension and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7622-9758
Medical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The assessment of elite athletes after SARS-CoV-2 infection gives rise to doubts concerning return-to-play decisions: what period of convalescence is needed and what diagnostic measures are appropriate. While cardiovascular protocols have been widely discussed in the literature, lung parenchyma imaging was only briefly mentioned, and the usefulness of lung ultrasound has been not considered yet. Materials and methods: A total of 31 elite Caucasian male athletes (mean age: 26.03 ± 5.62), recovered from COVID-19 were assessed after SARS-COV-2 infection. Medical data was collected. Lung ultrasonography and high-resolution computed tomography were performed. Results: Normal lung parenchyma dominated on CT scans. A total of 25 athletes (80.6%) presented abnormalities on high-resolution computed tomography; changes typical for COVID-19 were detected in five cases (16.1%), and less specific abnormalities were identified in 20 athletes (64.5%). Despite the prevalence of ultrasound abnormalities, A-line pattern was dominant in 23 athletes (74.2%): for 434 ultrasound-scans, it was visible in = 265 (61.1%). In 93.2% of the subjects, it corresponded to a normal lung parenchyma pattern visible on high-resolution computed tomography. The sensitivity of lung ultrasonography in comparison to high-resolution computed tomography was 74.65%, while the specificity was 68.56%. Conclusion: Lung changes are frequent, but not extensive. Ultrasound A-line pattern was associated with normal lung parenchyma findings revealed on high-resolution computed tomography. The negative predictive value for lung ultrasonography (93.2%) points towards its suitability in return-to-play protocols.

Indexed as

diagnosticlung ultrasonographymultimodality imagingSARS-Cov-2sports medicine

Identifiers

PMID36482923
PMCPMC9714289
OpenAlexW4285094758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.