ArticleJournal of ultrasonography2022
Lung Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography Comparison in Convalescent Athletes after Sars-CoV-2 Infection - A Preliminary Study.
Article in Journal of ultrasonography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The assessment of elite athletes after SARS-CoV-2 infection gives rise to doubts concerning return-to-play decisions: what period of convalescence is needed and what diagnostic measures are appropriate. While cardiovascular protocols have been widely discussed in the literature, lung parenchyma imaging was only briefly mentioned, and the usefulness of lung ultrasound has been not considered yet. Materials and methods: A total of 31 elite Caucasian male athletes (mean age: 26.03 ± 5.62), recovered from COVID-19 were assessed after SARS-COV-2 infection. Medical data was collected. Lung ultrasonography and high-resolution computed tomography were performed. Results: Normal lung parenchyma dominated on CT scans. A total of 25 athletes (80.6%) presented abnormalities on high-resolution computed tomography; changes typical for COVID-19 were detected in five cases (16.1%), and less specific abnormalities were identified in 20 athletes (64.5%). Despite the prevalence of ultrasound abnormalities, A-line pattern was dominant in 23 athletes (74.2%): for 434 ultrasound-scans, it was visible in = 265 (61.1%). In 93.2% of the subjects, it corresponded to a normal lung parenchyma pattern visible on high-resolution computed tomography. The sensitivity of lung ultrasonography in comparison to high-resolution computed tomography was 74.65%, while the specificity was 68.56%. Conclusion: Lung changes are frequent, but not extensive. Ultrasound A-line pattern was associated with normal lung parenchyma findings revealed on high-resolution computed tomography. The negative predictive value for lung ultrasonography (93.2%) points towards its suitability in return-to-play protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.