Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36482913›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Giant cell arteritis: A population-based retrospective cohort study exploring incidence and clinical presentation in Canterbury, Aotearoa New Zealand.

Suellen A Lyne, Carlee Ruediger, Susan Lester, Peter T Chapman, Ernst Michael Shanahan, Catherine L Hill, Lisa Stamp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Suellen A LyneSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Carlee RuedigerSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Susan LesterSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Peter T ChapmanDepartment of Rheumatology, Te Whatu Ora Waitematā, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Ernst Michael ShanahanDepartment of Rheumatology, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Catherine L HillSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Lisa StampDepartment of Rheumatology, Te Whatu Ora Waitematā, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Flinders Medical Centre · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AUWaitemata District Health Board · NZQueen Elizabeth Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: To determine the epidemiology and clinical features of giant cell arteritis (GCA) in Canterbury, Aotearoa New Zealand, with a particular focus on extra-cranial large vessel disease. Methods: Patients with GCA were identified from radiology and pathology reports, outpatient letters and inpatient hospital admissions in the Canterbury New Zealand from 1 June 2011 to 31 May 2016. Data was collected retrospectively based on review of electronic medical records. Results: There were 142 cases of GCA identified. 65.5% of cases were female with a mean age of 74.2 years. The estimated population incidence for biopsy-proven GCA was 10.5 per 100,000 people over the age of 50 and incidence peaked between 80 and 84 years of age. 10/142 (7%) people were diagnosed with large vessel GCA, often presenting with non-specific symptoms and evidence of vascular insufficiency including limb claudication, vascular bruits, blood pressure and pulse discrepancy, or cerebrovascular accident. Those with limited cranial GCA were more likely to present with the cardinal clinical features of headache and jaw claudication. Patients across the two groups were treated similarly, but those with large vessel disease had greater long-term steroid burden. Rates of aortic complication were low across both groups, although available follow-up data was limited. Conclusion: This study is the first of its kind to describe the clinical characteristics of large vessel GCA in a New Zealand cohort. Despite small case numbers, two distinct subsets of disease were recognized, differentiating patients with cranial and large vessel disease. Our results suggest that utilization of an alternative diagnostic and therapeutic approach may be needed to manage patients with large vessel disease.

Indexed as

epidemiologygiant cell arteritisincidencelarge vessel vasculitis (LVV)vasculitis

Identifiers

PMID36482913
PMCPMC9723338
OpenAlexW4309689364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.