Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36482910›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Application of visual placement of a nasojejunal indwelling feeding tube in intensive care unit patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

Yuequn Chen, Xin Tian, Cheng Liu, Liqin Zhang, Yueyuan Xv, Shuang Xv

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuequn ChenDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Lishui, China.
Xin TianDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Lishui, China.
Cheng LiuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Lishui, China.
Liqin ZhangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Lishui, China.
Yueyuan XvDepartment of Digestive Internal Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Lishui, China.
Shuang XvDepartment of Equipment Department, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Lishui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Compared with nasogastric nutrition, nasojejunal nutrition may prevent some complications of critically ill patients by maintaining better nutritional status, and blind placement of nasojejunal dwelling feeding tubes is widely used. However, the visual placement seems to be safer and more effective than the blind placement, and is still seldom reported. Objective: We tried to develop visual placement of a nasojejunal feeding tube in intensive care unit patients. Methods: A total of 122 patients receiving mechanical ventilation were admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University and received the placement of nasojejunal feeding tubes. These patients were randomly and evenly assigned into two groups, one group receiving visual placement of nasojejunal dwelling feeding tubes and another group receiving blind placement. Actual tube placement was confirmed by X-ray. The primary outcome included the success rates of first placement of feeding tubes. The secondary outcome included the time of tube placement, complications, the total cost, heart rates and respiratory rates. Results: The primary outcome showed that the success rates of first placement were 96.70% (59 cases/61 cases) in the visual placement group, and two cases failed due to pyloric stenosis and gastroparesis. The success rates were 83.6% (51 cases/61 cases) in the blind placement group and 10 cases failed due to either wrong placement or retrograde tube migration. The success rates in the visual placement group were higher than that in the blind placement group ( Conclusion: Compared with the blind placement, the visual placement shortened the time of nasojejunal tube placement and increased success rates of first placement. The visual placement was more efficient, easy to operate, safe, and has potential clinical applications.

Indexed as

blind placementfirst placement of feeding tubeintensive care unit patientsmechanical ventilationnasojejunal dwelling feeding tubevisual placement

Identifiers

PMID36482910
PMCPMC9722953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.