Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36482835›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2023

Development and validation of a health and nutrition module for the project-level Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI+HN).

Jessica Heckert, Elena M Martinez, Greg Seymour, Audrey Pereira, Shalini Roy, Sunny S Kim, Hazel Malapit, Gender Assets and Agriculture Project Phase 2 (GAAP2) Health and Nutrition Study Team

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica HeckertPoverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3022-8298
Elena M MartinezCGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9800-6651
Greg SeymourEnvironment and Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2213-0450
Audrey PereiraPoverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7982-7454
Shalini RoyPoverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Sunny S KimPoverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3960-3354
Hazel MalapitPoverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7394-8797
Gender Assets and Agriculture Project Phase 2 (GAAP2) Health and Nutrition Study Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agricultural development projects increasingly aim to improve health and nutrition outcomes, often by engaging women. Although evidence shows such projects can improve women's and children's health and nutrition and empower women, little is known about their impacts on women's health- and nutrition-related agency and the extent to which impacts emerge through women's empowerment, largely due to a lack of instruments that measure the dimensions of women's agency that are directly relevant to health and nutrition outcomes. We developed an optional, complementary module for the project-level women's empowerment in agriculture index (pro-WEAI) to measure health- and nutrition-related agency (pro-WEAI + HN). Our method for developing related indicators used data collected from six agricultural development programmes implemented across Bangladesh, Burkina Faso and Mali (pooled sample = 12,114) and applied psychometric analysis (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis) and the Alkire-Foster methodology. Results revealed seven indicators covering women's agency in the areas of her own health and diet; her health and diet during pregnancy; her child's diet; breastfeeding and weaning; purchasing food and health products; and acquiring food and health products. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis revealed measurement invariance across contexts and samples. Tests of association (Cramer's V) and redundancy suggest that the pro-WEAI + HN indicators measured aspects of agency that are distinct from the core pro-WEAI. The uptake of these indicators in studies of nutrition-sensitive agricultural development projects may strengthen the evidence on how such programming can enhance women's empowerment to improve health and nutrition outcomes for themselves and their children.

Indexed as

Child HealthMothersAgricultureChildFemaleHumansNutritional StatusPregnancyWomen's Healthagencygender equalityhealth indicatorsnutrition indicatorsnutrition-sensitive programmeswomen's empowerment

Identifiers

PMID36482835
PMCPMC10019063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read27
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.