Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36482826›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

A valued voice: A qualitative analysis of parental decision-making preferences in emergent paediatric surgery.

Erica M Carlisle, Laura A Shinkunas, Emily Ruba, Caleb J Klipowicz, Maxwell T Lieberman, Richard M Hoffman, Heather S Reisinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A valued voice: A qualitative analysis of parental decision-making preferences in emergent paediatric surgery.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erica M CarlisleDepartment of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3884-9793
Laura A ShinkunasCollege of Medicine, Program in Bioethics and Humanities, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Emily RubaCollege of Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Caleb J KlipowiczDepartment of Anthropology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Maxwell T LiebermanDepartment of Anthropology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Richard M HoffmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Heather S ReisingerCollege of Medicine, Program in Bioethics and Humanities, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
The University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR002537 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HANSEN, MARLAN R, WINOKUR, PATRICIA · 2018 to 2022
$20.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionShared decision-making, with an emphasis on patient autonomy, is often advised in healthcare decision-making. However, this may be difficult to implement in emergent settings. We have previously demonstrated that when considering emergent operations for their children, parents prefer surgeon guidance as opposed to shared decision-making. Here, we interviewed parents of paediatric patients who had undergone emergent operations to better understand parental decision-making preferences.

methodsParents of paediatric patients who underwent surgery over the past 5 years at a University-based, tertiary children's hospital for cancer, an emergent operation while in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were invited to complete a 60-min semi-structured interview. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic content analysis was performed via deductive and inductive analysis. An iterative approach to thematic sampling/data analysis was used.

resultsThematic saturation was achieved after 12 interviews (4 cancer, 5 NICU and 3 ECMO). Five common themes were identified: (1) recommendations from surgeons are valuable; (2) 'lifesaving mode': parents felt there were no decisions to be made; (3) effective ways of obtaining information about treatment; (4) shared decision-making as a 'dialogue' or 'discussion' and (5) parents as a 'valued voice' to advocate for their children.

conclusionsWhen engaging in decision-making regarding emergent surgical procedures for their children, parents value a surgeon's recommendation. Parents felt that discussion or dialogue with surgeons defined shared decision-making, and they believed that the opportunity to ask questions gave them a 'valued voice', even when they felt there were no decisions to be made. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: For this study, we interviewed parents of paediatric patients who had undergone emergent operations to better understand parental decision-making preferences. Parents thus provided all the data for the study.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSurgeonsChildDecision MakingDecision Making, SharedHumansInfant, NewbornParentsQualitative Researchdecision-makingemergentpaediatric surgery

Identifiers

PMID36482826
PMCPMC9854285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.