Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36482800›Full record

Observational studyESC heart failure2023

Pragmatic screening for heart failure in the general population using an electrocardiogram-based neural network.

Kishore Surendra, Sylvia Nürnberg, Jan P Bremer, Marius S Knorr, Frank Ückert, Jan Per Wenzel, Ramona Bei der Kellen, Dirk Westermann, Renate B Schnabel, Raphael Twerenbold and 5 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in ESC heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 2024 update in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kishore SurendraDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Sylvia NürnbergInstitute of Applied Medical Informatics, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jan P BremerDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Marius S KnorrDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Frank ÜckertInstitute of Applied Medical Informatics, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jan Per WenzelDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Ramona Bei der KellenDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Dirk WestermannDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Renate B SchnabelDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Raphael TwerenboldDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Christina MagnussenDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Paulus KirchhofDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan BlankenbergDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Johannes NeumannDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Benedikt SchrageDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe aim to develop a pragmatic screening tool for heart failure at the general population level. METHODS AND

resultsThis study was conducted within the Hamburg-City-Health-Study, an ongoing, prospective, observational study enrolling randomly selected inhabitants of the city of Hamburg aged 45-75 years. Heart failure was diagnosed per current guidelines. Using only digital electrocardiograms (ECGs), a convolutional neural network (CNN) was built to discriminate participants with and without heart failure. As comparisons, known risk variables for heart failure were fitted into a logistic regression model and a random forest classifier. Of the 5299 individuals included into this study, 318 individuals (6.0%) had heart failure. Using only the digital ECGs instead of several risk variables as an input, the CNN provided a comparable predictive accuracy for heart failure versus the logistic regression model and the random forest classifier [area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75, a sensitivity of 0.67 and a specificity of 0.69 for the CNN; AUC 0.77, a sensitivity of 0.63 and a specificity of 0.76 for the logistic regression; AUC 0.79, a sensitivity of 0.67 and a specificity of 0.72 for the random forest classifier].

conclusionsUsing a CNN build on digital ECGs only and requiring no additional input, we derived a screening tool for heart failure in the general population. This could be perfectly embedded into clinical routine of general practitioners, as it builds on an already established diagnostic tool and does not require additional, time-consuming input. This could help to alleviate the underdiagnosis of heart failure.

Indexed as

Heart FailureNeural Networks, ComputerElectrocardiographyHumansProspective StudiesRandom ForestHeart failurePopulationPragmaticScreening

Identifiers

PMID36482800
PMCPMC10053173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.