Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36482647›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2022

Clinical features, risk factors, and antimicrobial resistance of pseudomonas putida isolates.

Hüsnü Baykal, Deniz Çelik, A Füsun Ülger, Sedat Vezir, M Ömür Güngör

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beyond the Usual Suspects: EmergingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  6. Microbial signatures of neonatal bacterial meningitis from multiple body sites.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hüsnü BaykalDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Ankara, Turkey.
Deniz ÇelikDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4634-205
A Füsun ÜlgerDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Ankara, Turkey.
Sedat VezirDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Ankara, Turkey.
M Ömür GüngörDepartment of Occupational Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRAlanya University · TRHacettepe University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudomonas putida rarely results in infection, primarily in patients undergoing invasive procedures or immunocompromised hosts. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of Pseudomonas putida infections. This is a retrospectively designed cross-sectional observational study. We retrospectively scanned the data from our hospital for the 10 years before February 15, 2022. The patients with Pseudomonas putida growth in the microbiological cultures and with antibiotic susceptibility tests were included in the study. We recorded culture isolates types, age, gender, comorbidities, immunosuppressive factors, symptoms, invasive medical procedures, length of hospital stay, and radiological findings. The mean age of the patients was 66.2 ± 14.5 years, and the male patients predominated (76.3%, n = 58/76). There was growth in bronchial lavage in 33 patients, sputum in 28, pleural effusion fluid in 12, and tracheal aspirate in 3 patients. The rate of antibiotic-resistant strains was 56.6% (n = 43). All strains were sensitive to colistin (100%), and carbapenem, amikacin, and gentamicin sensitivity rates were high. We observed that the risk of antibiotic resistance increased 4.29 times in the patients in the intensive care unit (Cl:1.27-14.47, P = .01). The patients with Diabetes Mellitus had a higher risk (OR 4.33, Cl:1.11-16.77, P = .03), and in cancer cases, the risk was 3.31 times higher (Cl:1.06-10.32, P = .03). The risk of Pseudomonas putida infection should be considered, particularly in patients with comorbid disorders causing immunosuppression, including Diabetes Mellitus and Cancer.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusPseudomonas putidaAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID36482647
PMCPMC9726331
OpenAlexW4311081307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.