Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36482477›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2022

Evaluation of novel surfactants for plant transformation.

Jennie Huynh, Sara K Hotton, Ron Chan, Yasra Syed, James Thomson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. NovelMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennie HuynhCrop Improvement and Genetics, Western Regional Research Center, USDA-ARS, Albany, CA, USA.
Sara K HottonCrop Improvement and Genetics, Western Regional Research Center, USDA-ARS, Albany, CA, USA.
Ron ChanCrop Improvement and Genetics, Western Regional Research Center, USDA-ARS, Albany, CA, USA.
Yasra SyedCrop Improvement and Genetics, Western Regional Research Center, USDA-ARS, Albany, CA, USA.
James ThomsonCrop Improvement and Genetics, Western Regional Research Center, USDA-ARS, Albany, CA, USA. James.Thomson@usda.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9847-1377
Western Regional Research Center · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAssess the efficiency of seven novel surfactants, relative to the typical Silwet

resultsFloral dip transformation of Arabidopsis has been used consistently for 20 years with little change in the protocol. Here we directly compare seven novel surfactants (BREAK-THRU

Indexed as

ArabidopsisSurface-Active AgentsSurface-Active AgentsAgrobacteriumArabidopsisBREAK-THRU®-OE446, -S200, -S233, -S240, -S279, -S301 and -SP133Silwet® L-77SurfactantTransformation

Identifiers

PMID36482477
PMCPMC9733262
OpenAlexW4311574749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.