Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36482402›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2022

Automated classification of time-activity-location patterns for improved estimation of personal exposure to air pollution.

Lia Chatzidiakou, Anika Krause, Mike Kellaway, Yiqun Han, Yilin Li, Elizabeth Martin, Frank J Kelly, Tong Zhu, Benjamin Barratt, Roderic L Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Feasibility Study on the Use of NOSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lia ChatzidiakouYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Rd, CB2 1EW, Cambridge, UK. ec571@cam.ac.uk.
Anika KrauseYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Rd, CB2 1EW, Cambridge, UK.
Mike KellawayAtmospheric Sensors Ltd, SG19 3SH, Bedfordshire, UK.
Yiqun HanEnvironmental Research Group, MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, W12 0BZ, London, UK.
Yilin LiYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Rd, CB2 1EW, Cambridge, UK.
Elizabeth MartinYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Rd, CB2 1EW, Cambridge, UK.
Frank J KellyEnvironmental Research Group, MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, W12 0BZ, London, UK.
Tong ZhuBIC-ESAT and SKL-ESPC, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Center for Environment and Health, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Benjamin BarrattEnvironmental Research Group, MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, W12 0BZ, London, UK.
Roderic L JonesYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Rd, CB2 1EW, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR\L01341X\1Medical Research Council MR/L019744/1Medical Research Council MR\L019744\1Medical Research Council MR/S019669/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAir pollution epidemiology has primarily relied on measurements from fixed outdoor air quality monitoring stations to derive population-scale exposure. Characterisation of individual time-activity-location patterns is critical for accurate estimations of personal exposure and dose because pollutant concentrations and inhalation rates vary significantly by location and activity.

methodsWe developed and evaluated an automated model to classify major exposure-related microenvironments (home, work, other static, in-transit) and separated them into indoor and outdoor locations, sleeping activity and five modes of transport (walking, cycling, car, bus, metro/train) with multidisciplinary methods from the fields of movement ecology and artificial intelligence. As input parameters, we used GPS coordinates, accelerometry, and noise, collected at 1 min intervals with a validated Personal Air quality Monitor (PAM) carried by 35 volunteers for one week each. The model classifications were then evaluated against manual time-activity logs kept by participants.

resultsOverall, the model performed reliably in classifying home, work, and other indoor microenvironments (F1-score>0.70) but only moderately well for sleeping and visits to outdoor microenvironments (F1-score=0.57 and 0.3 respectively). Random forest approaches performed very well in classifying modes of transport (F1-score>0.91). We found that the performance of the automated methods significantly surpassed those of manual logs.

conclusionsAutomated models for time-activity classification can markedly improve exposure metrics. Such models can be developed in many programming languages, and if well formulated can have general applicability in large-scale health studies, providing a comprehensive picture of environmental health risks during daily life with readily gathered parameters from smartphone technologies.

Indexed as

Air PollutionArtificial IntelligenceBicyclingHumansAutomated time-activity classificationMulti-pollutant personal exposurePortable sensor technologies

Identifiers

PMID36482402
PMCPMC9733291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.