Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36482383›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2022

Comparison of surgical smoke between two approaches for endoscopic thyroidectomy and open thyroidectomy.

Zhe Zhang, Gongsheng Jin, Xianfu Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhe ZhangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, 287 Changhuai Road, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Gongsheng JinThe First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, 287 Changhuai Road, Bengbu, Anhui, China. jgs2007@qq.com.
Xianfu LiuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, 287 Changhuai Road, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College · CN

Funding

Key Technologies Research and Development Program of Anhui Province 202004j07020009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical smoke has been recognized as a potential health risk by an increasing number of researchers. Moreover, the counts of surgical smoke produced during different surgical approaches are different. This study aimed to measure and compare the particulate matter (PM) of surgical smoke generated during open thyroidectomy and two endoscopic approaches for thyroidectomy to provide guidance for safe clinical practices.

methodsForty-eight patients with thyroid cancer admitted to our hospital from June 2020 to December 2021 and treated with different surgical approaches were enrolled in this study. The total and peak counts of PM, dynamic changes, and other characteristics of surgical smoke produced during surgery were recorded. PM was classified as PM

resultsIn a single cut, both the peak and total counts of PM

conclusionIn thyroid surgery, more surgical smoke is produced during open thyroidectomy than during endoscopic thyroidectomy, while different endoscopic approaches showed no significant difference in surgical smoke production. Thus, endoscopic approaches outperform the open thyroidectomy approach with regard to surgical smoke production.

Indexed as

SmokeHumansSmokeEndoscopic surgeryOpen surgeryParticulate matterSurgical smokeThroidectomy

Identifiers

PMID36482383
PMCPMC9733340
OpenAlexW4311580602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.