ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022
Evaluation of preoperative calculation methods of osteotomy size in ankylosing spondylitis with thoracolumbar or lumbar kyphosis.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-Powered Lateral DEXA Morphometry for Integrated Evaluation of Thoracic Kyphosis and Bone Density Assessment in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- When to select two-level modified pedicle subtraction osteotomy in severe kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis?BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Novel mathematical model for preoperatively predicting pelvic tilt in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis due to ankylosing spondylitis after three-column osteotomy.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the accuracy of different preoperative calculation methods of osteotomy size in ankylosing spondylitis with thoracolumbar or lumbar kyphosis and analyze its clinical significance.
methodsTwenty-two cases of AS patients with thoracolumbar or lumbar kyphosis, from January 2015 to December 2018, who underwent one-level SPO surgery in our hospital, were retrospectively reviewed. The sagittal parameters were measured at pre-operation and last follow up using Surgimap software, and theoretical values of sagittal parameters were calculated according to pre-operative PI. The osteotomy angles of different methods were measured using Surgimap software. Paired t test was used to for the statistical analysis.
resultsThe mean follow-up time of all patients was 30.00 [Formula: see text] 3.56 months. The osteotomy sites were located at T12 in 3 cases, L1 in 6 cases, L2 in 9 cases, and L3 in 4 cases. Compared to pre-operative sagittal parameters, post-operative PT, SS, LL, and SVA were significantly improved (P [Formula: see text] 0.05). Compared to the OVA (46.57 [Formula: see text] 2.32 [Formula: see text]), there was a significantly larger angle predicted by Surgimap method (53.80 [Formula: see text] 9.79 [Formula: see text]), CAM-HA method (56.61 [Formula: see text] 8.58 [Formula: see text]), and HP-HA method (60.07 [Formula: see text] 13.58 [Formula: see text]), respectively (P [Formula: see text] 0.05). But no significant difference was found between the postoperative osteotomy angle and those of SFA method (51.24 [Formula: see text] 12.14 [Formula: see text]) and FBI method (48.08 [Formula: see text] 12.49 [Formula: see text]) (P [Formula: see text] 0.05).
conclusionFor AS patients with thoracolumbar or lumbar kyphosis, the SFA method, FBI method, and Surgimap method can be used to predict the osteotomy angle precisely, however, considering the rationality of parameter settings and the operability, SFA method is relatively more suitable for such population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.