Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36482357›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2022

Providers' perspectives on the reproductive decision-making of BRCA-positive women.

E S Dason, L Drost, E M Greenblatt, A S Scheer, J Han, M Sobel, L Allen, M Jacobson, T Doshi, E Wolff and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

E S DasonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1E2, Canada. Shirin.dason@mail.utoronto.ca.
L DrostDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.
E M GreenblattDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1E2, Canada.
A S ScheerDepartment of General Surgery, St. Michaels Hospital, Unity Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
J HanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.
M SobelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1E2, Canada.
L AllenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1E2, Canada.
M JacobsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1E2, Canada.
T DoshiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.
E WolffDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.
E McMahonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.
C A JonesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1E2, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReproductive decision-making is difficult for BRCA-positive women. Our objective was to assess the complexities of decision-making and identify decisional supports for patients and providers when discussing reproductive options prior to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO).

methodsThis study was of qualitive design, using data collection via semi-structured interviews conducted from November 2018 to October 2020. Individuals were included if they were identified to provide care to BRCA-positive women. In total, 19 providers were approached and 15 consented to participate. Providers were recruited from three clinics in Toronto, Ontario located at academic centers: [1] A familial ovarian cancer clinic, [2] A familial breast cancer clinic and [3] A fertility clinic, all of which treat carriers of the BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic mutation. The interview guide was developed according to the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and included questions regarding reproductive options available to patients, factors that impact the decision-making process and the role of decisional support. Interviews were transcribed and transcripts were analyzed thematically using NVIVO 12.

resultsProviders identified three major decisions that reproductive-aged women face when a BRCA mutation is discovered: [1] "Do I want children?"; [2] "Do I want to take the chance of passing on this the mutation?"; and [3] "Do I want to carry a child?" Inherent decision challenges that are faced by both providers and patients included difficult decision type, competing options, scientifically uncertain outcomes, and challenging decision timing. Modifiable decisional needs included: inadequate knowledge, unrealistic expectations, unclear values and inadequate support or resources. Identified clinical gaps included counselling time constraints, lack of reliable sources of background information for patients or providers and need for time-sensitive, geographically accessible, and centralized care.

conclusionOur study identified a need for a patient information resource that can be immediately provided to patients who carry a BRCA genetic mutation. Other suggestions for clinical practice include more time during consultation appointments, adequate follow-up, value-centric counseling, access to psychosocial support, and a specialized decisional coach.

Indexed as

AdultChildFemaleHumansOntarioCryopreservationDecision supportGene mutationsQualitative researchReproductive decision-making

Identifiers

PMID36482357
PMCPMC9730610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.