Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36482336›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2022

End-user research in support of long-acting systemic antiretroviral delivery systems: insights from qualitative research with providers and target users in South Africa.

Morgan S Brown, Homaira Hanif, Kristen M Little, Meredith R Clark, Andrea R Thurman, Lola Flomen, Gustavo F Doncel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Morgan S BrownEvidence Department, Population Services International (PSI), 1120 19th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC, 20020, USA.
Homaira HanifCONRAD, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Kristen M LittleEvidence Department, Population Services International (PSI), 1120 19th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC, 20020, USA. klittle@psi.org.
Meredith R ClarkCONRAD, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Andrea R ThurmanCONRAD, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Lola FlomenEvidence Department, Population Services International (PSI), 1120 19th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC, 20020, USA.
Gustavo F DoncelCONRAD, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Eastern Virginia Medical School · USPopulation Services International · US

Funding

United States Agency for International Development AID-OAA-A-17-00014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been shown to reduce the risk of HIV, challenges such as adhering to a daily-dosing regimen and persistence have emerged as barriers for at-risks populations in South Africa. This qualitative research sought to investigate perceptions of and preferences for a long-acting, biodegradable implantable PrEP product designed to address these barriers.

methodsTo identify and understand motivators, barriers, and preferences for the PrEP implant, we conducted qualitative in-depth interviews (IDIs) among health care providers (HCPs) and target end-users (young women, adolescent girls, and female sex workers) in urban and rural/peri-urban regions of Gauteng Province, South Africa. The IDIs focused on defining values, beliefs, habits, lifestyles, influencers, and information channels for potential PrEP implant end-users.

resultsWe conducted 36 IDIs across health care providers and target end-user respondent segments. Respondents had generally positive reactions to the PrEP implant. Most end-users felt that some undesirable aspects of the implant (e.g., side effects, pain during insertion, potential scarring, and inability to remove implant) would be offset by having a highly effective, and long-lasting HIV prevention product. Although some HCPs believed the implantable PrEP would lead to increases in promiscuity and risky sexual behavior, most HCPs saw value in the PrEP implant's long duration of protection, its biodegradability, and the likelihood of higher adherence relative to oral PrEP.

conclusionsThis study is a first step toward further research needed to demonstrate the demand for a biodegradable, long-acting implantable PrEP and suggests such a product would be accepted by end-users and HCPs in South Africa. This study indicates the need to develop more convenient, discreet, long-acting, and highly effective biomedical HIV prevention options for at-risk populations.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSex WorkersAdolescentFemaleHumansQualitative ResearchSouth AfricaHIVPrEP implantSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID36482336
PMCPMC9733032
OpenAlexW4311588964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.