Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36482335›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2022

DART: diagnostic-CT-enabled planning: a randomized trial in palliative radiation therapy (study protocol).

Melissa O'Neil, Timothy K Nguyen, Joanna Laba, Robert Dinniwell, Andrew Warner, David A Palma

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05233904 (DART), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05233904 naunknown statusnot on this map

DART: Diagnostic-CT-Enabled Planning: A Randomized Trial in Palliative Radiation Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2022 to 2023Enrolled33ConditionsAdvanced Cancer Requiring Palliative RadiationArmsDiagnostic-CT-enabled Planning, Standard of Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melissa O'NeilDepartment of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, P.O. Box 5010, STN B, 800 Commissioners Rd. E, London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada.
Timothy K NguyenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, P.O. Box 5010, STN B, 800 Commissioners Rd. E, London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada.
Joanna LabaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, P.O. Box 5010, STN B, 800 Commissioners Rd. E, London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada.
Robert DinniwellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, P.O. Box 5010, STN B, 800 Commissioners Rd. E, London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada.
Andrew WarnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, P.O. Box 5010, STN B, 800 Commissioners Rd. E, London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada.
David A PalmaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, P.O. Box 5010, STN B, 800 Commissioners Rd. E, London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada. david.palma@lhsc.on.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9542-0627
Western University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliative radiotherapy (PRT) is an effective treatment for managing symptoms of advanced cancer. At least half of all radiation treatments are delivered with palliative intent, aimed at relieving symptoms, such as pain or shortness of breath. Symptomatic patients must receive PRT quickly, therefore expeditious treatment planning is essential. Standard radiation planning requires a dedicated CT scan acquired at the cancer centre, called a 'CT simulation', which facilitates treatment planning (i.e. tumor delineation, placement of radiation beams and dose calculation). However, the CT simulation process creates a bottleneck and often leads to delays in starting treatment. Other researchers have indicated that CT simulation can be replaced by the use of standard diagnostic CT scans for target delineation and planning, which are normally acquired through the radiology department as part of standard patient workup. The goals of this feasibility study are to assess the efficacy, acceptability and scalability of diagnostic-CT-enabled planning, compared to conventional CT simulation planning, for patients receiving PRT to bone, soft tissue and lung disease.

methodsThis is a randomized, phase II study, with 33 PRT patients to be randomized in a 1:2 ratio between conventional CT simulation (Arm 1), and the diagnostic CT enabled planning workflow (Arm 2). Patients will be stratified by treatment target volume (bone and soft tissue metastasis vs. primary or metastatic intrathoracic disease targets). The primary endpoint is the amount of time the patient spends at the cancer centre. Secondary endpoints include efficacy (rate of plan deliverability and rate of plan acceptability on blinded dose distribution review), stakeholder acceptability (based on patient and clinician perception of acceptability questionnaires) and scalability. DISCUSSION: This study will investigate the efficacy, acceptability and scalability of a "sim-free" PRT pathway compared to conventional CT simulation. The workflow may provide opportunity for resource optimization by using pre-existing diagnostic imaging and requires minimal investment due to its similarity to current PRT models. It also offers potential benefit to patients by eliminating an imaging procedure, reducing the amount of time spent at the cancer centre, and expediting time to treatment.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05233904. Date of registration: February 10, 2022; current version: 1.4 on April 29, 2022.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicHumansAlternative radiation workflowDiagnostic CT planningpalliative radiotherapyrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID36482335
PMCPMC9733349
OpenAlexW4311584839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.