ArticleBMC palliative care2022
DART: diagnostic-CT-enabled planning: a randomized trial in palliative radiation therapy (study protocol).
Article in BMC palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05233904 (DART), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
DART: Diagnostic-CT-Enabled Planning: A Randomized Trial in Palliative Radiation Therapy
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementing a fully computed tomography-free online adaptive palliative radiotherapy: a one-visit workflow.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Simulation-free radiotherapy on the MR-linac in prostate cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Simulation-Free Palliative Radiation Therapy: Implementing the Value-Based and Easier-Access Model of Care in a Rural Setting.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2025Review
- Simulation-free cone beam CT-based online adaptive radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- Magnetic resonance-only rapid on-table planning and immediate treatment for spine metastases.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Palliative radiotherapy of soft tissue tumoral masses based on diagnostic instead of planning computed tomography scans.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Prompt Pain Relief From Bone Metastases: The Virtual Simulation Program.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Simulation-Free Radiation Therapy: An Emerging Form of Treatment Planning to Expedite Plan Generation for Patients Receiving Palliative Radiation Therapy.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
- "Scan-(pre)Plan-Treat" Workflow for Bone Metastases Using the Ethos Therapy System: A Single-Center, In Silico Experience.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPalliative radiotherapy (PRT) is an effective treatment for managing symptoms of advanced cancer. At least half of all radiation treatments are delivered with palliative intent, aimed at relieving symptoms, such as pain or shortness of breath. Symptomatic patients must receive PRT quickly, therefore expeditious treatment planning is essential. Standard radiation planning requires a dedicated CT scan acquired at the cancer centre, called a 'CT simulation', which facilitates treatment planning (i.e. tumor delineation, placement of radiation beams and dose calculation). However, the CT simulation process creates a bottleneck and often leads to delays in starting treatment. Other researchers have indicated that CT simulation can be replaced by the use of standard diagnostic CT scans for target delineation and planning, which are normally acquired through the radiology department as part of standard patient workup. The goals of this feasibility study are to assess the efficacy, acceptability and scalability of diagnostic-CT-enabled planning, compared to conventional CT simulation planning, for patients receiving PRT to bone, soft tissue and lung disease.
methodsThis is a randomized, phase II study, with 33 PRT patients to be randomized in a 1:2 ratio between conventional CT simulation (Arm 1), and the diagnostic CT enabled planning workflow (Arm 2). Patients will be stratified by treatment target volume (bone and soft tissue metastasis vs. primary or metastatic intrathoracic disease targets). The primary endpoint is the amount of time the patient spends at the cancer centre. Secondary endpoints include efficacy (rate of plan deliverability and rate of plan acceptability on blinded dose distribution review), stakeholder acceptability (based on patient and clinician perception of acceptability questionnaires) and scalability. DISCUSSION: This study will investigate the efficacy, acceptability and scalability of a "sim-free" PRT pathway compared to conventional CT simulation. The workflow may provide opportunity for resource optimization by using pre-existing diagnostic imaging and requires minimal investment due to its similarity to current PRT models. It also offers potential benefit to patients by eliminating an imaging procedure, reducing the amount of time spent at the cancer centre, and expediting time to treatment.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05233904. Date of registration: February 10, 2022; current version: 1.4 on April 29, 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.