Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36482191›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2023

Mismatch repair markers in preoperative and operative endometrial cancer samples; expression concordance and prognostic value.

Hege F Berg, Hilde Engerud, Madeleine Myrvold, Hilde E Lien, Marta Espevold Hjelmeland, Mari K Halle, Kathrine Woie, Erling A Hoivik, Ingfrid S Haldorsen, Olav Vintermyr and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Expression patterns of mismatch repair proteins in cervical cancer uncover independent prognostic value of MSH-2.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Mismatch repair geneFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hege F Berg *Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1712-6609
Hilde Engerud *Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Madeleine MyrvoldCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Hilde E LienCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Marta Espevold HjelmelandCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Mari K HalleCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2660-8271
Kathrine WoieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Erling A HoivikCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0680-765X
Ingfrid S HaldorsenSection of Radiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Olav VintermyrDepartment of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Jone TrovikCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Camilla KrakstadCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. camilla.krakstad@uib.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0174-8139
Haukeland University Hospital · NO

Funding

Helse Vest (Western Norway Regional Health Authority) F-12542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe endometrial cancer mismatch repair (MMR) deficient subgroup is defined by loss of MSH6, MSH2, PMS2 or MLH1. We compare MMR status in paired preoperative and operative samples and investigate the prognostic impact of differential MMR protein expression levels.

methodsTumour lesions from 1058 endometrial cancer patients were immunohistochemically stained for MSH6, MSH2, PMS2 and MLH1. MMR protein expression was evaluated as loss or intact to determine MMR status, or by staining index to evaluate the prognostic potential of differential expression. Gene expression data from a local (n = 235) and the TCGA (n = 524) endometrial cancer cohorts was used for validation.

resultsWe identified a substantial agreement in MMR status between paired curettage and hysterectomy samples. Individual high expression of all four MMR markers associated with non-endometrioid subtype, and high MSH6 or MSH2 strongly associated with several aggressive disease characteristics including high tumour grade and FIGO stage, and for MSH6, with lymph node metastasis. In multivariate Cox analysis, MSH6 remained an independent prognostic marker, also within the endometrioid low-grade subgroup (P < 0.001).

conclusionWe demonstrate that in addition to determine MMR status, MMR protein expression levels, particularly MSH6, may add prognostic information in endometrial cancer.

Indexed as

DNA Mismatch RepairEndometrial NeoplasmsBrain NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2MutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryPrognosisMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2MutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 Protein

Identifiers

PMID36482191
PMCPMC9938259
OpenAlexW4310949328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.