Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36482183›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2023

Fish intake and risk of cardiovascular events: an analysis of the VITAL cohort.

Daniel Caldeira, Beatriz Nogueira-Garcia, Ana Abreu, Fausto J Pinto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel CaldeiraCardiology Department, Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria - CHULN, Santa Maria, Portugal. dgcaldeira@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2520-5673
Beatriz Nogueira-GarciaCardiology Department, Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria - CHULN, Santa Maria, Portugal.
Ana AbreuCardiology Department, Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria - CHULN, Santa Maria, Portugal.
Fausto J PintoCardiology Department, Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria - CHULN, Santa Maria, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8034-4529

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary habits with fish consumption have been associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease, based on heterogenous observational studies. Current recommendations suggest eating at least 1-2 fish servings per week for CV prevention.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective evaluation of a cohort study that enrolled a large primary prevention population to determine the potential benefit of fish intake ≥1.5 serving per week, through a multivariate Cox regression model. The outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, MACE (composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke, and death from cardiovascular causes), expanded MACE (MACE plus coronary revascularization), total myocardial infarction (MI), total coronary heart disease (CHD) and total stoke. The estimates were reported using hazard ratio (HR) with 99% confidence intervals (99% CI).

resultsA total of 25,435 patients were evaluated (11,921 individuals ≥1.5 fish servings/week; 13,514 < 1.5 fish servings per week). Intake ≥1.5 servings/week was not independently associated with CV outcomes reduction, such as CV mortality, MI risk MACE, expanded MACE outcomes, CHD or stroke (HR 0.78, 99% CI 0.57-1.07).

conclusionFish intake ≥1.5 servings/week was not associated with CV outcomes improvement in this analysis, but potential benefit cannot be ruled out.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCoronary DiseaseMyocardial InfarctionStrokeAnimalsCohort StudiesHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.