Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36481873›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2023

Anterior surgical treatment for cervical degenerative radiculopathy: a prediction model for non-success.

Christer Mjåset, Tore K Solberg, John-Anker Zwart, Milada C Småstuen, Frode Kolstad, Margreth Grotle

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The use of the Core Yellow Flags Index for the assessment of psychosocial distress in patients undergoing surgery of the cervical spine.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christer MjåsetFaculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. chrmja@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0210-1396
Tore K SolbergInstitute of Clinical Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8991-8867
John-Anker ZwartFaculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5721-0154
Milada C SmåstuenDepartment of Rehabilitation and Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs Plass, P.O. Box 4, 0130, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8947-8649
Frode KolstadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1234-8576
Margreth GrotleDivision of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Research and Innovation, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, 0424, Oslo, Nydalen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8243-1143
Oslo University Hospital · NOOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBy using data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery, we wanted to develop and validate prediction models for non-success in patients operated with anterior surgical techniques for cervical degenerative radiculopathy (CDR).

methodsThis is a multicentre longitudinal study of 2022 patients undergoing CDR surgery and followed for 12 months to find prognostic models for non-success in neck disability and arm pain using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Model performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and a calibration test. Internal validation by bootstrapping re-sampling with 1000 repetitions was applied to correct for over-optimism. The clinical usefulness of the neck disability model was explored by developing a risk matrix for individual case examples.

resultsThirty-eight percent of patients experienced non-success in neck disability and 35% in arm pain. Loss to follow-up was 35% for both groups. Predictors for non-success in neck disability were high physical demands in work, low level of education, pending litigation, previous neck surgery, long duration of arm pain, medium-to-high baseline disability score and presence of anxiety/depression. AUC was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.75, 0.82). For the arm pain model, all predictors for non-success in neck disability, except for anxiety/depression, were found to be significant in addition to foreign mother tongue, smoking and medium-to-high baseline arm pain. AUC was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.64, 0.72).

conclusionThe neck disability model showed high discriminative performance, whereas the arm pain model was shown to be acceptable. Based upon the models, individualized risk estimates can be made and applied in shared decision-making with patients referred for surgical assessment.

Indexed as

Neck PainRadiculopathyCervical VertebraeDisability EvaluationHumansLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArm painDegenerative neck surgeryNeck disabilityOutcomePredictorsPrognostic model

Identifiers

PMID36481873
PMCPMC9840586
OpenAlexW4310940731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.