Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36481679›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Physical but not virtual presence of others potentiates implicit and explicit learning.

Pietro Sarasso, Irene Ronga, Elena Del Fante, Paolo Barbieri, Irene Lozzi, Nicola Rosaia, Alessandro Cicerale, Marco Neppi-Modona, Katiuscia Sacco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pietro SarassoBIP (BraIn Plasticity and Behaviour Changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi, 10, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Irene RongaBIP (BraIn Plasticity and Behaviour Changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi, 10, 10124, Turin, Italy. irene.ronga@unito.it.
Elena Del FanteBIP (BraIn Plasticity and Behaviour Changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi, 10, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Paolo BarbieriBIP (BraIn Plasticity and Behaviour Changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi, 10, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Irene LozziBIP (BraIn Plasticity and Behaviour Changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi, 10, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Nicola RosaiaDepartment of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Alessandro CiceraleBIP (BraIn Plasticity and Behaviour Changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi, 10, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Marco Neppi-ModonaBIP (BraIn Plasticity and Behaviour Changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi, 10, 10124, Turin, Italy.
Katiuscia SaccoBIP (BraIn Plasticity and Behaviour Changes) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi, 10, 10124, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E-learning activities are becoming more and more common. Whilst it is well known that the physical presence of others motivates individuals to engage in perceptual and learning tasks, systematic investigations comparing the effects of physical and virtual co-presence of others on knowledge acquisition are still scarce. Here we investigate the effects of physical and virtual co-presence of others on explicit and implicit learning. In Experiment 1 (discovery sample), retrieval accuracy in a spatial memory task and EEG indexes (mismatch negativity-MMN) of implicit perceptual learning were recorded when participants were alone or in presence of another individual. In Experiment 2 (replicating sample), we added a "virtual" condition, where the same tasks were performed during a video-conference call. In both experiments, MMN was demonstrated to encode for perceptual learning as revealed by the significant correlation with Bayesian Surprise (a consolidated information-theoretic index of Bayesian learning). Furthermore, In Experiments 1 and 2 physical co-presence systematically ameliorated memorization performances and increased MMN indexes related to implicit learning. These positive effects were absent in the virtual condition, thus suggesting that only physical, but not virtual co-presence is effective in potentiating learning dynamics.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremHumans

Identifiers

PMID36481679
PMCPMC9732282
OpenAlexW4311588717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.