Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36480773›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023

Population, Clinical, and Scientific Impact of National Cancer Institute's National Clinical Trials Network Treatment Studies.

Joseph M Unger, Michael LeBlanc, Suzanne George, Norman Wolmark, Walter J Curran, Peter J O'Dwyer, Mitchell D Schnall, Robert S Mannel, Sumithra J Mandrekar, Robert J Gray and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. When to adjust for multiplicity in cancer clinical trials.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Patient Enrollment to Industry-Sponsored Versus Federally-Sponsored Cancer Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  12. Correlative Science in the Cooperative Group System: Re-Engineering for Success.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  13. Decentralized Clinical Trials in Early Drug Development-A Framework Proposal.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Organization of Cancer Specialists in US Physician Practices and Health Systems.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph M UngerSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0002-5191-0317
Michael LeBlancSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Suzanne GeorgeOffice of the Alliance Group Chair, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-1284-8493
Norman WolmarkNRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA.
Walter J CurranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Peter J O'DwyerDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Mitchell D SchnallDepartment of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Robert S MannelStephenson Cancer Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK.
Sumithra J MandrekarDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-7658-1134
Robert J GrayEastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Biostatistics Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-5724-4917
Fengmin ZhaoEastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Biostatistics Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Mariama BahSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Riha VaidyaSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0001-5316-6352
Charles D BlankeSWOG Cancer Research Group Chair's Office, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USAmerican College of Radiology · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USChicago Department of Public Health · USEmory University · USMayo Clinic · USOregon Health & Science University · USOU Health Stephenson Cancer CenterUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
SWOG Statistics & Data Management Center complex - extension supplement for GY06U10CA180819 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Michael L. LeBlanc · 2014 to 2026
$115.2M
Statistics CoreU10CA180794 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI PAUL J CATALANO, CONSTANTINE A. GATSONIS · 2014 to 2026
$111.2M
SWOG NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189974 · NCI · THE HOPE FOUNDATION · PI CHARLES D. BLANKE, DAWN HERSHMAN · 2014 to 2026
$80.6M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180794NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180819NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the United States, the National Cancer Institute National Cancer Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) groups have conducted publicly funded oncology research for 50 years. The combined impact of all adult network group trials has never been systematically examined.

methodsWe identified randomized, phase III trials from the adult NCTN groups, reported from 1980 onward, with statistically significant findings for ≥ 1 clinical, time-dependent outcomes. In the subset of trials in which the experimental arm improved overall survival, gains in population life-years were estimated by deriving trial-specific hazard functions and hazard ratios to estimate the experimental treatment benefit and then mapping this trial-level benefit onto the US cancer population using registry and life-table data. Scientific impact was based on citation data from Google Scholar. Federal investment costs per life-year gained were estimated. The results were derived through December 31, 2020.

resultsOne hundred sixty-two trials comprised of 108,334 patients were analyzed, representing 29.8% (162/544) of trials conducted. The most common cancers included breast (34), gynecologic (28), and lung (14). The trials were cited 165,336 times (mean, 62.2 citations/trial/year); 87.7% of trials were cited in cancer care guidelines in favor of the recommended treatment. These studies were estimated to have generated 14.2 million (95% CI, 11.5 to 16.5 million) additional life-years to patients with cancer, with projected gains of 24.1 million (95% CI, 19.7 to 28.2 million) life-years by 2030. The federal investment cost per life-year gained through 2020 was $326 in US dollars.

conclusionNCTN randomized trials have been widely cited and are routinely included in clinical guidelines. Moreover, their conduct has predicted substantial improvements in overall survival in the United States for patients with oncologic disease, suggesting they have contributed meaningfully to this nation's health. These findings demonstrate the critical role of government-sponsored research in extending the lives of patients with cancer.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMedical OncologyNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)United States

Identifiers

PMID36480773
PMCPMC10082246
OpenAlexW4311023666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.