Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36480568›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Barriers to reducing preoperative testing for low-risk surgical procedures: A qualitative assessment guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Amanda Hall, Andrea Pike, Andrea Patey, Sameh Mortazhejri, Samantha Inwood, Shannon Ruzycki, Kyle Kirkham, Krista Mahoney, Jeremy Grimshaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amanda HallPrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3966-8502
Andrea PikePrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Andrea PateyCentre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8770-4494
Sameh MortazhejriCentre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Samantha InwoodPrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8900-9017
Shannon RuzyckiDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kyle KirkhamDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Krista MahoneyFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Jeremy GrimshawCentre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile numerous guidelines do not recommend preoperative tests for low risk patients undergoing low risk surgeries, they are often routinely performed. Canadian data suggests preoperative tests (e.g. ECGs and chest x-rays) preceded 17.9%-35.5% of low-risk procedures. Translating guidelines into clinical practice can be challenging and it is important to understand what is driving behaviour when developing interventions to change it.

aimThus, we completed a theory-based investigation of the perceived barriers and enablers to reducing unnecessary preoperative tests for low-risk surgical procedures in Newfoundland, Canada.

methodWe used snowball sampling to recruit surgeons, anaesthesiologists, or preoperative clinic nurses. Interviews were conducted by two researchers using an interview guide with 31 questions based on the theoretical domains framework. Data was transcribed and coded into the 14 theoretical domains and then themes were identified for each domain.

resultsWe interviewed 17 surgeons, anaesthesiologists, or preoperative clinic nurses with 1 to 34 years' experience. Overall, while respondents agreed with the guidelines they described several factors, across seven relevant theoretical domains, that influence whether tests are ordered. The most common included uncertainty about who is responsible for test ordering, inability to access patient records or to consult/communicate with colleagues about ordering decisions and worry about surgery delays/cancellation if tests are not ordered. Other factors included workplace norms that conflicted with guidelines and concerns about missing something serious or litigation. In terms of enablers, respondents believed that clear institutional guidelines including who is responsible for test ordering and information about the risk of missing something serious, supported by improved communication between those involved in the ordering process and periodic evaluation will reduce any unnecessary preoperative testing.

conclusionThese findings suggest that both health system and health provider factors need to be addressed in an intervention to reduce pre-operative testing.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingCanadaHumansNewfoundland and LabradorSocial Problems

Identifiers

PMID36480568
PMCPMC9731462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.