Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36480551›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Closing the life-cycle of normative modeling using federated hierarchical Bayesian regression.

Seyed Mostafa Kia, Hester Huijsdens, Saige Rutherford, Augustijn de Boer, Richard Dinga, Thomas Wolfers, Pierre Berthet, Maarten Mennes, Ole A Andreassen, Lars T Westlye and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Structural similarity networks reveal brain vulnerability in dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Lifespan Normative Modeling of Brain Microstructure.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Seyed Mostafa KiaDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7128-814X
Hester HuijsdensDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Saige RutherfordDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Augustijn de BoerDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Richard DingaDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3040-1297
Thomas WolfersDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Pierre BerthetDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6878-6842
Maarten MennesDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ole A AndreassenNorwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lars T WestlyeDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Christian F BeckmannDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Andre F MarquandDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098369/Z/12/ZWellcome Trust 215698/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical neuroimaging data availability has grown substantially in the last decade, providing the potential for studying heterogeneity in clinical cohorts on a previously unprecedented scale. Normative modeling is an emerging statistical tool for dissecting heterogeneity in complex brain disorders. However, its application remains technically challenging due to medical data privacy issues and difficulties in dealing with nuisance variation, such as the variability in the image acquisition process. Here, we approach the problem of estimating a reference normative model across a massive population using a massive multi-center neuroimaging dataset. To this end, we introduce a federated probabilistic framework using hierarchical Bayesian regression (HBR) to complete the life-cycle of normative modeling. The proposed model provides the possibilities to learn, update, and adapt the model parameters on decentralized neuroimaging data. Our experimental results confirm the superiority of HBR in deriving more accurate normative ranges on large multi-site neuroimaging datasets compared to the current standard methods. In addition, our approach provides the possibility to recalibrate and reuse the learned model on local datasets and even on datasets with very small sample sizes. The proposed method will facilitate applications of normative modeling as a medical tool for screening the biological deviations in individuals affected by complex illnesses such as mental disorders.

Indexed as

PrivacyBayes TheoremHumans

Identifiers

PMID36480551
PMCPMC9731431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.