Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36480408›Full record

ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2023

Inter- and intra-rater agreement of interpretation of functional lumen imaging probe in healthy subjects.

Rena Yadlapati, C Prakash Gyawali, Dustin A Carlson, John E Pandolfino, Ronnie Fass, Abraham Khan, Haiying Lin, Joel E Richter, Marcelo F Vela, Michael Vaezi and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Rena YadlapatiDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7872-2033
C Prakash GyawaliDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3388-0660
Dustin A CarlsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1702-7758
John E PandolfinoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ronnie FassDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Metro Health Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4807-3052
Abraham KhanCenter for Esophageal Health, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8683-2320
Haiying LinMedtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Joel E RichterJoy McCann Culverhouse Center for Esophageal and Swallowing Disorders, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Marcelo F VelaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5350-4654
Michael VaeziDivision of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
John O ClarkeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Northwestern University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMedtronic (United States) · USMetroHealth Medical Center · USStanford University · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of South Florida · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Mechanism Guided Therapy for Laryngopharyngeal RefluxK23DK125266 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI YADLAPATI, RENA HIREN · 2021 to 2025
$963k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK125266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) evaluates esophagogastric junction (EGJ) opening and esophageal contractility. Both post hoc and real-time analyses are possible, but reproducibility and reliability of analysis remain undefined. This study assesses inter- and intra-rater agreement of normative FLIP measurements among novice and experienced users.

methodsEight motility experts from different institutions independently evaluated de-identified video recordings from 27 asymptomatic healthy subjects using FLIP. Interpretation methods simulating a post-procedure and a live procedure setting were tested. Novice FLIP users (n = 3) received training prior to post-procedure interpretation. Experienced FLIP users (n = 5) interpreted using both methods. Users recorded maximum EGJ and distal esophageal body diameter, distensive pressure, and EGJ distensibility index (EGJ-DI), at balloon fill volumes of 50-, 60-, and 70 ml, as well as repetitive antegrade contractions (RACs). Inter- and intra-rater agreements of diameters, distensive pressure and EGJ-DI were assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC). Percentage agreement evaluated inter- and intra-rater reliability for RACs. KEY

resultsNovice and experienced users acquired normative FLIP metrics. Good-to-excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability were achieved for all variables at 60 ml balloon fill volumes. Median parameters at 60 ml balloon fill volume were as follows: EGJ-DI 5.5 mm CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Normative FLIP parameters can be reliably extracted from FLIP videos using both real-time and post hoc analyses, with high reliability between experienced and novice users.

Indexed as

Esophageal AchalasiaEsophagogastric JunctionHealthy VolunteersHumansManometryReproducibility of Resultsachalasiaesophageal motilitymanometryper oral endoscopic myotomy

Identifiers

PMID36480408
PMCPMC10726675
OpenAlexW4310944053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.