SynthesisSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2023
Daytime napping and coronary heart disease risk in adults: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiple Health Outcomes of Daytime Napping: A Comprehensive Umbrella Review.Public health reviews · 2026Review
- 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Prevalence and associated factors of napping among older adults in the Philippines.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe present study investigated the association between daytime napping and coronary heart disease (CHD) risk among adults.
methodsArticles were detected by using PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus databases until November 8th, 2021. The relevant data were found among the eight included articles and were pooled for meta-analysis in adult participants via a random-effects model.
resultsAmong 167,025 adults, the results revealed that daytime napping was associated with an enhanced risk of CHD (risk ratios [RR] = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.60; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by daytime napping duration also indicated that daytime napping for at least 1 h had three times higher influence on the enhanced risk of CHD (RR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.58; p < 0.001) than that of daytime napping for less than 1 h (RR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.19; p = 0.014). In addition, subgroup analysis by region illustrated that daytime napping was linked with an enhanced risk of CHD in Chinese (RR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.19, 1.66; p < 0.001), but not in European or American populations. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis of napping duration and risk of CHD suggested that their relation was significant just in those studies that controlled for depressive symptoms (RR = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.29, 1.80; p < 0.001, n = 3) and night sleep duration (RR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.21, 1.66; p < 0.001, n = 5). The linear dose-response meta-analysis revealed that each 15-min increase in daytime napping was related with a 5% higher risk of CHD (RR = 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.08; I
conclusionResults showed that daytime napping was related with an increased risk of CHD in adults. The evidence from this study suggests that the public should be made conscious of the adverse outcomes of long daytime napping for CHD, notably among the Chinese population. Additional studies are required to confirm potential links between CHD risk and daytime napping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.