Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36480084›Full record

ArticlePhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology2023

Residue alterations within a conserved hydrophobic pocket influence light, oxygen, voltage photoreceptor dark recovery.

Stefanie Hemmer, Marianne Schulte, Esther Knieps-Grünhagen, Joachim Granzin, Dieter Willbold, Karl-Erich Jaeger, Renu Batra-Safferling, Vineet Panwalkar, Ulrich Krauss

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Stefanie HemmerInstitut Für Molekulare Enzymtechnologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425, Jülich, Germany.
Marianne SchulteIBI-7: Structural Biochemistry, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425, Jülich, Germany.
Esther Knieps-GrünhagenInstitut Für Molekulare Enzymtechnologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425, Jülich, Germany.
Joachim GranzinIBI-7: Structural Biochemistry, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425, Jülich, Germany.
Dieter WillboldIBI-7: Structural Biochemistry, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425, Jülich, Germany.
Karl-Erich JaegerInstitut Für Molekulare Enzymtechnologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425, Jülich, Germany.
Renu Batra-SafferlingIBI-7: Structural Biochemistry, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425, Jülich, Germany.
Vineet PanwalkarIBI-7: Structural Biochemistry, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425, Jülich, Germany.
Ulrich KraussInstitut Für Molekulare Enzymtechnologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425, Jülich, Germany. u.krauss@fz-juelich.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2219-7388
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung FKZ 031A16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light, oxygen, voltage (LOV) photoreceptors are widely distributed throughout all kingdoms of life, and have in recent years, due to their modular nature, been broadly used as sensor domains for the construction of optogenetic tools. For understanding photoreceptor function as well as for optogenetic tool design and fine-tuning, a detailed knowledge of the photophysics, photochemistry, and structural changes underlying the LOV signaling paradigm is instrumental. Mutations that alter the lifetime of the photo-adduct signaling state represent a convenient handle to tune LOV sensor on/off kinetics and, thus, steady-state on/off equilibria of the photoreceptor (or optogenetic switch). Such mutations, however, should ideally only influence sensor kinetics, while being benign with regard to the nature of the structural changes that are induced by illumination, i.e., they should not result in a disruption of signal transduction. In the present study, we identify a conserved hydrophobic pocket for which mutations have a strong impact on the adduct-state lifetime across different LOV photoreceptor families. Using the slow cycling bacterial short LOV photoreceptor PpSB1-LOV, we show that the I48T mutation within this pocket, which accelerates adduct rupture, is otherwise structurally and mechanistically benign, i.e., light-induced structural changes, as probed by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography, are not altered in the variant. Additional mutations within the pocket of PpSB1-LOV and the introduction of homologous mutations in the LOV photoreceptor YtvA of Bacillus subtilis and the Avena sativa LOV2 domain result in similarly altered kinetics. Given the conserved nature of the corresponding structural region, the here identified mutations should find application in dark-recovery tuning of optogenetic tools and LOV photoreceptors, alike.

Indexed as

Photoreceptors, MicrobialLightMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMutationOxygenPhotochemistryOxygenPhotoreceptors, MicrobialOptogeneticsPhotocycle kineticsPhotoreceptorSignalingStructure–function

Identifiers

PMID36480084
OpenAlexW4310956956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.