Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36480026›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Impact of deep learning image reconstructions (DLIR) on coronary artery calcium quantification.

Alexia Rossi, Antonio G Gennari, Dominik Etter, Dominik C Benz, Thomas Sartoretti, Andreas A Giannopoulos, Nidaa Mikail, Susan Bengs, Alexander Maurer, Catherine Gebhard and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alexia RossiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. alexia.rossi@usz.ch.
Antonio G GennariDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dominik EtterDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dominik C BenzDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Thomas SartorettiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas A GiannopoulosDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nidaa MikailDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Susan BengsDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alexander MaurerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Catherine GebhardDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ronny R BuechelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Philipp A KaufmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tobias A FuchsDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael MesserliDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep learning image reconstructions (DLIR) have been recently introduced as an alternative to filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms for computed tomography (CT) image reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of DLIR on image quality and quantification of coronary artery calcium (CAC) in comparison to FBP.

methodsOne hundred patients were consecutively enrolled. Image quality-associated variables (noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)) as well as CAC-derived parameters (Agatston score, mass, and volume) were calculated from images reconstructed by using FBP and three different strengths of DLIR (low (DLIR_L), medium (DLIR_M), and high (DLIR_H)). Patients were stratified into 4 risk categories according to the Coronary Artery Calcium - Data and Reporting System (CAC-DRS) classification: 0 Agatston score (very low risk), 1-99 Agatston score (mildly increased risk), Agatston 100-299 (moderately increased risk), and ≥ 300 Agatston score (moderately-to-severely increased risk).

resultsIn comparison to standard FBP, increasing strength of DLIR was associated with a significant and progressive decrease of image noise (p < 0.001) alongside a significant and progressive increase of both SNR and CNR (p < 0.001). The use of incremental levels of DLIR was associated with a significant decrease of Agatston CAC score and CAC volume (p < 0.001), while mass score remained unchanged when compared to FBP (p = 0.232). The underestimation of Agatston CAC led to a CAC-DRS misclassification rate of 8%.

conclusionDLIR systematically underestimates Agatston CAC score. Therefore, DLIR should be used cautiously for cardiovascular risk assessment. KEY POINTS: • In coronary artery calcium imaging, the implementation of deep learning image reconstructions improves image quality, by decreasing the level of image noise. • Deep learning image reconstructions systematically underestimate Agatston coronary artery calcium score. • Deep learning image reconstructions should be used cautiously in clinical routine to measure Agatston coronary artery calcium score for cardiovascular risk assessment.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseDeep LearningAlgorithmsCalciumHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiation DosageRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedCalciumCardiac computed tomographyCardiovascular riskCoronary artery calciumDeep learningImage reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID36480026
PMCPMC10181951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.