Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36480002›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2023

Investigating the effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of QSM and a robust tilt correction method.

Oliver C Kiersnowski, Anita Karsa, Stephen J Wastling, John S Thornton, Karin Shmueli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Normative trajectories of RImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oliver C KiersnowskiDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6016-0514
Anita KarsaDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8648-3853
Stephen J WastlingNeuroradiological Academic Unit, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.
John S ThorntonNeuroradiological Academic Unit, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom.
Karin ShmueliDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7520-2975

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeQuantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is used increasingly for clinical research where oblique image acquisition is commonplace, but its effects on QSM accuracy are not well understood. THEORY AND

methodsThe QSM processing pipeline involves defining the unit magnetic dipole kernel, which requires knowledge of the direction of the main magnetic field

resultsRotation of wrapped phase images gave severe artifacts. Background field removal with projection onto dipole fields gave the most accurate susceptibilities when the field map was first rotated into alignment with

conclusionFor accurate QSM, oblique acquisition must be taken into account. Rotation of images into alignment with

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsBrainBrain MappingHumanselectromagnetic tissue propertiesoblique acquisitionQSMQSM accuracyquantitative susceptibility mappingtilted slices

Identifiers

PMID36480002
PMCPMC10953050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.