SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Effect of Danhong injection on prognosis and inflammatory factor expression in patients with acute coronary syndrome during the perioperative period of percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of Danhong injection on inflammatory factors and vascular endothelial function in patients with unstable angina pectoris: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Cardiometabolic multimorbidity and the risk of sudden cardiac death among geriatric community dwellers using longitudinal EHR-derived data.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: In China, Danhong injection (DHI) is recommended by expert consensus and is widely used in the perioperative management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study investigates the effect of perioperative DHI administration and the timing of DHI administration on patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by analyzing the prognosis and anti-inflammatory effects. This article summarizes the most up-to-date clinical evidence on DHI, and in this study, we assesses treatment efficacy of DHI in patients with ACS. Methods: A total of seven databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, SINOMED, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP) were searched from the time of their inception to 1 July 2022. Clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DHI combined with PCI for the treatment of ACS were included. RCT quality was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook risk-of-bias tool, and STATA 17.0 was used for meta-analysis. Results: In total, 33 studies including 3,458 patients with ACS undergoing PCI were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with conventional therapy alone, the combination of DHI and conventional therapy significantly decreased the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; Conclusion: The combination of DHI and conventional therapy results in a better therapeutic effect than that observed with conventional therapy alone in patients with ACS. To improve treatment efficacy, postoperative initiation of DHI is recommended as a standard treatment. Further research is needed to confirm these results. Systematic review registration: Identifier: CRD42022344830.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.